This submission has good foundations. After reviewing it, here are some points that could strengthen it:
First - The objectives need concrete metrics. When you say “improve dev experience” - what specific measurements will show success? Without clear numbers, it’s hard to judge actual progress versus random activity.
Second - Consider adding stronger accountability mechanisms. In my experience with governance systems (TEC and HNY communities), privileges should always be revocable based on performance. What happens if objectives aren’t met? The best governance systems have clear consequences built in.
Third - I’d like to see more direct connection to token value. Each workstream should explain its path to enhancing $ARB value - that’s ultimately what makes a proposal worth supporting.
The security workstream stands out as particularly solid. Starting there with a minimal implementation would let you demonstrate value before scaling up. This approach has worked well in other projects I’ve been involved with.
Overall, I think this has potential. These adjustments would make it even more compelling from a delegate perspective. Happy to chat specifics if helpful.