Comment on behalf of Camelot
From a business and economic standpoint, it makes sense to aggressively expand to other chains given the many competing alternatives. We’ve already started to see this with projects like Degen chain and experimental approaches involving BTC L2s.
However, we believe this expansion shouldn’t come at the expense of EVM chains. We prefer to have a solid foundation on those only rather than a less stable expansion across multiple platforms.
Currently, we see areas for improvement in the existing Orbit offering based on our experiences and the challenges we’ve encountered. Key points for improvement include enhancing bridging solutions, improving overall interoperability, and increasing the available infra services. Focusing on these improvements within EVM chains could be more beneficial before considering further expansion.
Ultimately, the decision depends on the current workload and resources of the OCL development team, as each expansion to a new vm will require significant effort and ongoing maintenance. Greater visibility into these factors would definitely help everyone provide more informed feedback.