Thank you, @Entropy, for this insightful proposal! I’ve voted “FOR” because I strongly believe such mechanisms are essential for maintaining accountability in a large DAO like Arbitrum, which distributes many grants and incentives.
As I mentioned recently in the Forum, Kleros—a decentralized dispute resolution protocol—has just launched its V2 Beta on Arbitrum. I think Arbitrum DAO could also consider using this court system as an initial screening phase to determine if there’s a rational basis for alleging misuse of funds. Introducing a neutral third-party perspective could help mitigate any risk of conflicts of interest.
However, recognizing the need for specialized knowledge, we could explore setting up a gated NFT version of this court system where only long-term delegates can serve as jurors in such cases.
I’d be happy to delve into more details with you about this. It would be great to see the DAO leveraging protocols built on Arbitrum Chain for these kind of usecases !