voting Against on the current onchain vote because despite personally pushing for this program to exist in the DAO, and even trying to help it come to fruition since October, the latest last minute changes to the program changed the nature of it significantly, namely: GlobaLeaks as a platform will not act as a neutral third-party and therefor it doesn’t ensure the anonymity of the whistleblowers; and more problematic, the inclusion of the Arbitrum Foundation and SeedGov into the reviewer set creates an explicit conflict of interest where the entities responsible to adjudicate grants will be the same that will review the reports of wrongly adjudicated grants and therefor undermining the neutrality and then the effectiveness of this program.