The following reflects the views of the Lampros DAO governance team, composed of Chain_L (@Blueweb) and @Euphoria, based on our combined research, analysis, and ideation.
We are voting AGAINST this proposal in the Snapshot voting.
We support the idea of putting idle ETH to work, but we cannot approve a large transfer now because the ATMC’s recent ETH allocations have underperformed simple staking, and there is no clear implementation plan for how the 8,500 ETH will be used.
The proposal mentions a blended 30-day APY near 2.4% and roughly 43.4 ETH generated since May. For a transfer of this size, those headline numbers are not enough; we need a side-by-side comparison of net APY after fees and costs against passive staking options (wstETH / Lido / Rocket Pool) and against high-quality DVT/validator options.
Equally important, the proposal does not lay out a concrete allocation plan. Moving 8,500 ETH without clear per-protocol allocations, caps, or documented selection rationale is premature. As other delegates mentioned, it is “premature to transfer ETH before a concrete and approved plan exists,” and we agree that funds should not be transferred first and decided upon later.
If part of the goal is ecosystem support, the proposal should also include measurable KPIs for those growth allocations and a timeline to reassess impact.
For these reasons, we are voting against it at this moment.