I appreciate the structure of this proposal, where you detail each problem separately.
Where, as per your analysis, there are 6 problems with the approved setup for OpCo:
- Inability to Interact with Service Providers
- Restrictive Treasury Spend
- Compensation for OpCo Employees
- Restrictions Around Council Elections.
- Declaring Conflict of Interest
- Ecosystem Support or Financial Management only
And for each one of those problems, you’ve suggested a solution.
I believe it’s best, for this offchain vote to be conducted with the approval voting type, where delegates would be able to signal support for each one of the changes individually, with all of their voting power being casted towards each “problem/solution change” they agree with.
In this way, we could agree to consider valid, each voting option, aka., each “problem/solution change”, that the delegates vote in support of, for the options that will gather more than the non-constitutional 3% quorum threshold in voting power support.
I really don’t think we should bundle all of these changes together, in a single For/Abstain/Against vote, since some of these changes are way more impactful than others, and it would force delegates to vote against the whole proposal, if they disagree with just one of the proposed “problem/solution changes”.