Ackee - Candidate for Security Council Elections - March 2025

Dear Arbitrum community,

Through this proposal, we at Ackee formally propose to run for the Arbitrum Security Council - March 2025 election.

About Ackee

Ackee Blockchain Security consists of ecosystem professionals securing smart contracts of leading Web3 organizations such as Lido, Aave, Axelar, 1inch, Safe, Pendle, LayerZero…Ackee also received tooling grants from organizations such as Ethereum Foundation, Coinbase and Optimism. Our mission is to contribute to a stronger blockchain ecosystem by providing security services, tooling, and education.

Our Contributions

Security Audits: We have completed over 175 audits, discovering over 190 criticals and high-severity issues. Our focus on manual code reviews and fuzz testing ensures that our findings are comprehensive.

Security Tooling: We develop open-source security tools Wake and Trident, which enhance smart contract testing and help secure Web3 applications across Ethereum, Solana, and other EVM blockchains.

  • Wake development and testing framework is a Python-based framework for testing, fuzz testing and deploying Solidity smart contracts. The tool is utilized by Ackee and independent entities to perform smart contract audits, it helped discover various high and critical vulnerabilities.

Education: Our team members run blockchain security courses at the Czech Technical University, led by CEO & Co-Founder Josef Gattermayer, Ph.D.


By applying for the council, Ackee is committed to contributing to the security of the Arbitrum ecosystem as part of our mission to enhance the safety of the Web3 space. We seek to play a meaningful role in the council and thank you for considering our candidacy.

For more information:

Website: https://ackee.xyz/

Github:


Ackee Team

3 Likes

Is the intent for Ackee, the organization, to stand as the candidate for the security council? Could I possibly sway you to stand an individual representative from Ackee as the candidate, instead?

I ask because the DAO Constitution as it is written seems to, by my interpretation, allow for “members” as in single individuals, but not organizations.

I would also feel more comfortable voting for an identifiable individual, even if under only an established pseudonym, than I would an organization whom I have no real insight into and which may shift in makeup at any time.

To avoid distracting this thread away from Ackee on the broader topic of the DAO Constitution, I’ve created a separate post to elaborating on the interpretation specifically in the submission announcement thread.

March 2025 Contender Submission Phase - #3 by Arbitrum as mentioned here, it would be good if Ackee could specify its representative for the Security Council elections.

@Hawheik @raam thank you for the feedback! Our CEO will apply as an individual as advised by you here.

1 Like

To confirm, you can still apply as an organization, as long as you are represented by an individual (i.e. your CEO).

2 Likes