I voted FOR.
Proper information/data is mandatory, and this proposal helps to enhance the one available for ArbitrumDAO.
1 Like
I voted For - Use ENS text records on this proposal at the temp check stage. This seems like a valuable way to improve access to Arbitrum DAO data in the ecosystem. I chose the ENS text records option because we should only gate high-risk technical upgrades behind constitutional proposals.
1 Like
I’m voting in favor for the option “FOR - Use ENS txt records”. I think that this proposal is a nice accessibility improvement, it fosters transparency and has no extra costs. Concerning the option, the reason behind my decision is that this will basically make things easier and won’t require an on-chain vote for every single change, which can be time-consuming. At the same time, this option allows changes to be made if the community requires them.
1 Like
Just voted in favor of using ENS txt records on Snapshot. EIP-4824 is a solid and useful standard, and it’s great to see it getting implemented on Arbitrum. Having a reliable source for trusted info will definitely help newcomers and anyone diving deeper into Arbitrum. Plus, no additional funding needed for this proposal is a huge bonus.
1 Like
Voted For - Use ENS TXT records: Picking up good practices from other DAOs makes sense. Putting as much info as possible on-chain is necessary for open and transparent governance. I support this kind of standard being adopted by all major DAOs. I agree that we should set the daoURI record on Arbitrum’s ENS. Also, it’s great that this upgrade doesn’t require any payment from the treasury.
1 Like
We are supporting the proposal with the ENS text record option as it aligns with our goal of enhancing the DAO’s accessibility. It’s a straightforward, no-cost solution to improve transparency and accessibility for ArbitrumDAO.
1 Like
voting For – Use registration contract in the current offchain proposal because this information should be under the control of the DAO not the Arbitrum Foundation. the other option of using “ENS txt records” would update the ENS arbitrumfoundation.eth which is not even the name of our DAO, which is “Arbitrum DAO”. Our Arbitrum DAO is not the ENS name arbitrumfoundation.eth, it is the set of onchain governor contracts that control our protocol and network, so that’s what should be updated to hold this information. Also, my vote is conditional to the fact that we should use as few dependencies as possible for the members and proposals dynamic URIs, so that the onchain representation of the DAO is not relying on private companies APIs, especially for publicly available onchain governance data.
1 Like
We’re voting FOR the ENS text record option. We definitely need a single source of truth for Arbitrum DAO’s metadata to improve accessibility and tooling integration. It’s a low-risk, no-cost improvement that aligns with best practices in the DAO ecosystem.
1 Like
The FranklinDAO / Penn Blockchain Team voted for the ENS Text Record option. We chose this option because its streamlined and efficient compared to a Constitutional Proposal. This is beneficial to all delegates and we’re looking forward to the integrations with DeepDAO, ArbScan, Snapshot, etc.
Voting “For”, should bring a lot of value. I indicated in the original thread that I would support this, but just voted against for procedural reasons (Team #6: An (EIP-4824 powered) daoURI for the Arbitrum DAO - #43 by Bob-Rossi)
Simply put - this will add value to the DAO at no cost, I don’t really see a reason to vote against.
Just voted FOR
It’s a simple and effective way to improve access to Arbitrum DAO’s data without needing extra funding or major changes to the existing smart contracts. Plus, it keeps things flexible—using text records allows for easy updates without requiring an on-chain vote every time. This feels like a practical move to help streamline how we manage important DAO information while keeping it transparent and decentralized.
We vote for Use ENS txt records on Snapshot.
This change leads to a better accessibility of the metadata for the toolings in the ecosystem, without additional cost. We believe it’s acceptable to utilize the ENS records for the information.
After consideration, the @SEEDgov delegation has decided to “FOR - Use ENS txt records” on this proposal at the Snapshot vote.
Rationale
As we expressed during the previous vote, we support this initiative as it significantly improves information accessibility, enabling external parties to learn about various DAO details in one centralized location and at no cost to the DAO.
However, when selecting between the two options, we opted for the ENS txt records, prioritizing simplicity. Although we generally prefer the DAO to maintain as much autonomy as possible, keeping the information updated could prove challenging without a dedicated manager.
I voted YES.
Making open and accessible data more transparent with no additional costs is only a a benefit to this industry.
The following reflects the views of L2BEAT’s governance team, composed of @krst and @Sinkas, and it’s based on the combined research, fact-checking, and ideation of the two.
We are voting FOR this proposal for the same reasons we supported it in the past.
The previous vote for this proposal was defeated simply because of a hiccup in the governance process. The proposal has now followed the proper procedure and has also received a security review from the ARDC, which raised no significant concerns. Given that, we see no reason to vote against it.
1 Like
The results are in for the An EIP-4824 powered daoURI for Arbitrum DAO off-chain proposal.
See how the community voted and more Arbitrum stats:
gm, voted FOR this proposal.
Adding more transparency to our processes is always useful, would be great to understand how many people will actually look into that.
Chose the ENS option as the simplest one.
DAOplomats voted in favor of this proposal on Snapshot.
An official repository of information on the DAO is net-positive and would certainly provide people with a reliable location of verified onchain information. There are no additional costs to the DAO and with the ARDC seeing no issues with it, we were happy to vote in favor.