Proposal: UPDATED - Ethereum Protocol Attackathon Sponsorship
Vote: Against
Rationale: We really value initiatives that focus on Ethereum security, as it’s crucial for the long-term success of Arbitrum and the entire ecosystem. However, the amount requested feels like a bit too much for this sponsorship, especially since it’s an online event and our main benefit would be having our logo displayed in a few places. While we support the idea behind this, we believe the cost doesn’t quite match the value Arbitrum would receive, so we’ll be voting against this proposal.
Proposal: [NON-CONSTITUTIONAL] Arbitrum DAO Procurement Committee: Phase II Proposal
Vote: For
Rationale: We are supporting the extension of the ADPC due to the significant progress demonstrated in Phase I, particularly in establishing critical procurement frameworks and promoting transparency within the DAO. The committee’s foundational work in the whitelisting process for security providers and their active community engagement are essential to ensuring accountability and operational efficiency.
Proposal: Constitutional AIP - Extend Delay on L2Time Lock
Vote: For
Rationale: We support extending the L2 time lock. It gives the community more time to review decisions, making the process safer and more thoughtful. The slight delay is worth it for better security. The trade-off of slightly slower processes is justified by the increased protection against rushed or poorly considered actions.
Proposal: [Non-Constitutional] Whitelist Infura Nova Validator
Vote: Whitelist Infura Validator
Rationale: We’re supporting this proposal because infura has a strong track record as a trusted infrastructure provider, consistently delivering 99.6% uptime. They’ve also been supporting the network behind the scenes for years.
Proposal: Research on context and retention
Vote: For
Rationale: After reviewing feedback from other delegates, we decided to support this proposal as it provides valuable insights to the community. the research would be helpful in understanding the data, and it would be beneficial for gaining a deeper understanding.
Proposal: An EIP-4824 powered daoURI for Arbitrum DAO
Vote: For - Use ENS txt record
Rationale: We are supporting the proposal with the ENS text record option as it aligns with our goal of enhancing the DAO’s accessibility. It’s a straightforward, no-cost solution to improve transparency and accessibility for ArbitrumDAO.
Proposal: [Non-Constitutional] Funds to Bolster Foundation’s Strategic Partnerships Budget
Vote: For
Rationale: After reviewing this proposal and considering feedback from other delegates, we have decided to support it. We recognize that without approving this allocation, the Arbitrum ecosystem could miss out on significant strategic opportunities essential for its growth and competitiveness. However, we acknowledge that 250 million ARB is a substantial amount, so we want to ensure that these funds will be used in the most efficient and effective way possible. We would appreciate seeing detailed plans and regular reports to monitor the utilization of these funds. With this in mind, we believe this proposal will enable the Foundation to secure high-impact partnerships and initiatives that might otherwise be unattainable, ultimately benefiting the entire Arbitrum community.
Proposal: ArbitrumDAO strategic “Off-site” (online) updated proposal
Vote: For
Rationale: We are voting in favor of the ArbitrumDAO Offsite on Snapshot, as it has the potential to enhance community collaboration. However, we suggest providing a more detailed budget breakdown to ensure all costs are adequately covered, considering hybrid participation options like summaries or recordings for those unable to attend in person, and prioritizing security measures to ensure the safety of all delegates traveling to an unfamiliar area.
Proposal: Enhancing Multichain Governance: Upgrading RARI Governance Token on Arbitrum
Vote: For
Rationale: We are in favor of the RARI token contract upgrade and the shift of its governance to the Arbitrum.
Proposal: LTIPP Retroactive Community Funding Selections
Vote: Do not Fund
Rationale: Thanks to the team for their contribution to the LTIPP program! While we already have other ways to reward participants, we believe it’s crucial to recognize the extra work that goes beyond programs like the delegate incentive. For instance, efforts such as reporting and identifying areas for improvement deserve additional recognition. We’d also appreciate it if council members and advisors could provide further justification for the amounts awarded to each applicant, as they have the best insight into the applicants’ contributions.
However, we will be voting against this proposal as the distribution model should be based on the actual impact created and judged by the program manager and councils.
Proposal: Establishing a DAO Events Budget for 2025
Vote: For
Rationale: We’re supporting this proposal because having a dedicated event budget will allow the DAO to move faster and make the most of event opportunities without getting held up by the usual approval process. Events are crucial for building community. Many great initiatives have come from delegates who attended these events, leading to valuable collaborations.
Proposal: Fund the Stylus Sprint
Vote: For
Rationale: We support this proposal because it’s the right time to push this initiative, maintain momentum, and increase stylus developer adoption. Arbitrum can attract more developers and foster innovation. Additionally, we also agree that using RPGF would be a great approach to further support this initiative.
Proposal: [Non-Constitutional] Arbitrum DAO Delegate Incentive Program
Vote: For
Rationale: We support the Delegate Incentive Program proposal v1.5 and and want to give a big thanks to the Seedlatam team for putting it together. It’s honestly one of the most comprehensive and impactful delegate incentive experiments out there in the DAO space. Huge props to Seedlatam and everyone involved—the proposal is clear and well-structured. Since the program leans on Seedlatam to evaluate delegate comment quality, we’re confident they’ll keep things neutral throughout. Additionally, Curia has received a Questbook grant to build a governance analytics dashboard that also monitors delegate activities. As part of this grant, we’ll be providing monthly reports on delegate activities, participation, and engagement metrics to keep everything transparent and help the community verify the information. Our goal is to enable the community to track how effective the incentive program is, monitor these contributions, and help it succeed in the long run.
Proposal: (V2) Arbitrum Research & Development Collective
Vote: For - Funded with 1.73M USDC+ Council
Rationale: We appreciate the work that ARDC accomplished during phase 1, making valuable contributions to research, security, and risk for ArbitrumDAO. Based on their overall performance, we’re in favor of renewing the ARDC for another 6 months with the option A through the ARDC V2 Proposal, as we believe it is necessary for ArbitrumDAO to effectively manage its growing number of technical initiatives, especially those requiring smart contract implementation and risk assessment. The ARDC’s contributions to research and data analysis are crucial for the DAO to stay ahead and make informed decisions.
Proposal: [Non-Constitutional] Arbitrum Token Swap Pilot Program
Vote: Against
Rationale: We will vote against the Arbitrum Token Swap Pilot because it presents significant risks without guaranteed long-term benefits. Swapping ARB tokens could lower their value, and there’s no clear way to measure success.
Proposal: GCP Council Re-Confirmation Vote for Tim Chang
Vote: Reconfirm Tim Chang to GCPC
Rationale: We are voting to reconfirm both Tim Chang and John Kennedy. Their experience is valuable, and after reviewing their backgrounds, we have no concerns.
Tim’s extensive experience in venture capital, Web3, and tech, along with his track record of successful investments, has been crucial for GCP’s growth. John has quickly integrated into the Council, bringing fresh ideas and commitment.
Proposal: GCP Council Re-Confirmation Vote for John Kennedy
Vote: Reconfirm John Kennedy to GCPC
Rationale: We are voting to reconfirm both Tim Chang and John Kennedy. Their experience is valuable, and after reviewing their backgrounds, we have no concerns.
Tim’s extensive experience in venture capital, Web3, and tech, along with his track record of successful investments, has been crucial for GCP’s growth. John has quickly integrated into the Council, bringing fresh ideas and commitment.
Proposal: Adopt a Delegate Code of Conduct & Formalize Operations
Vote: For
Rationale: We’re voting in favor of the Delegate Code of Conduct because it feels like the right step as Arbitrum DAO continues to grow. Having some clear guidelines helps set expectations, making it easier to hold everyone accountable and creating a more transparent, respectful environment. We appreciate the focus on soft enforcement—it’s not about strict rules but rather encouraging good behavior over time. Plus, with a bit of structure around voting schedules and a holiday break, it feels like we’re setting up the DAO for smoother operations. Overall, it’s a solid foundation that will help keep Arbitrum aligned and professional as we scale.
Proposal: (V2) Arbitrum Research & Development Collective
Vote: For
Rationale: We appreciate the work that ARDC accomplished during phase 1, making valuable contributions to research, security, and risk for ArbitrumDAO. Based on their overall performance, we’re in favor of renewing the ARDC for another 6 months with the option A through the ARDC V2 Proposal, as we believe it is necessary for ArbitrumDAO to effectively manage its growing number of technical initiatives, especially those requiring smart contract implementation and risk assessment. The ARDC’s contributions to research and data analysis are crucial for the DAO to stay ahead and make informed decisions.
Proposal: Establishing a DAO Events Budget for 2025
Vote: For
Rationale: We’re supporting this proposal because having a dedicated event budget will allow the DAO to move faster and make the most of event opportunities without getting held up by the usual approval process. Events are crucial for building community. Many great initiatives have come from delegates who attended these events, leading to valuable collaborations.
Proposal: [Non-Constitutional] Treasury Management v1.2
Vote: For
Rationale: We support the idea of improving treasury management, as outlined in this proposal, as it aims to enhance how the DAO allocates and manages its assets. However, we believe the process could be further strengthened by allowing other parties to participate in the treasury and growth management processes. Introducing competition among service providers could result in better deals and more effective strategies for the DAO. Additionally, we suggest incorporating performance-based incentives for the Treasury and Growth Management Committees to keep them motivated, ensure they maximize returns while managing risks, and align their efforts with the DAO’s long-term goals.
Proposal: Restitution For Extensively Delayed ArbitrumDAO Minigrant Winners
Vote: Against
Rationale: We understand the challenges caused by delayed payouts and the fluctuations of the ARB token. However, since the grants were denominated in ARB from the start, the risk of token price fluctuations was an inherent aspect of the program that grantees accepted upon participation.so we decided to vote “Against”
Proposal: Hackathon Continuation Program
Vote: In favour, yes onchain mechanism
Rationale: We are in favor of this proposal. We understand how challenging it is for new projects to gain support and secure funding, especially at an early stage. Without access to experienced individuals and proper guidance, it’s difficult for potential projects to grow and thrive. Hackathons often spark incredible initiatives and ideas, and we believe having an accelerator program to bootstrap these projects will greatly benefit the Arbitrum ecosystem in the long term.