Currently voting in favor as support, with few things to address in tally that have been mentioned in the calls but are not clear enough in the proposal:
- the nature of protocols who could apply. Understanding that this proposal has a growth nature, we need to clarify if current protocols in arbitrum can apply, if protocols migrating/expanding from other chains can apply. And the answer likely can’t just be a single “yes” otherwise everybody who has to do an audit in arbitrum will come here making life of the committee miserable, there has to be some sort of wording on whom can apply
- I would like to know, being this a 1 year initiative, if we will be able to morph it over time based on SOS outcomes and in general other more robust framework we might have in the DAO to create long life tracks for protocols in Arbitrum, ie: a path in which you first get a grant, then an audit, then an investment, all over time.