I voted ABSTAIN in Snapshot because, while the motivations of the proposal are valid and it would provide crucial opportunities for emerging projects that, due to limited budgets, are unable to start their audits, the existence of a previous project with the same objective complicated my decision.
This previous project has already been approved, so why should we accept a new proposal with the same goals? This is not to detract from the current AF proposal, as I fully support its cause and recognize the importance of auditing and supporting initial projects.
However, my uncertainty appears from the fact that investment has already been made in a previous initiative. Why do we need to approve another similar proposal when a project with the same goals is still underway? This could involve double the effort and resources, which is not justified. With the current information and the existence of ongoing discussions about the two initiatives, I prefered to abstain.