Attaching here the slide deck of what was discussed Wednesday the 7th, during the public DAO call.
Hey @JoJo since when is @Erezedor been working as a domain allocator for the Dev Tooling domain?
he applied as a domain allocator for the Gaming domain here and didn’t won that election, and @Juandi was the one that applied, alone, to the Dev Tooling domain, and won that election.
So why is Erezedor acting as a Domain Allocator and is the one that has been posting the reviews and comments?
When did this happened?
GM Paulo!
After the election went through, Erezedor was hired by Juandi to work with him, on both the DA program and in other projects he is running, helping on the technical due diligence. Erezedor has been working in the Dev Tooling domain alongside Juandi basically since the beginning of the program.
Him being part of the team was mentioned several times already, is not a secret. This is for example the deck of the first quarterly call of June 2025, in which he is listed as part of the team.
1 Like
The tenth monthly report is live in our website!
TLDR:
- referencing period: 2nd of January 2026 - 1st of February 2026
- more than 1000 proposals since inception of the program! Specifically, 1063 proposals, in proposals in total, of which 147 were approved and 41 were completed
- Most of the submissions of this period are related to DeFi, Dev Toolings and Consumer App, showing how the active BD effort has been positively steering inbound applications toward the most important vertical of the ecosystem
The eleventh monthly report is live in our website!
TLDR:
- Referencing period: 2nd of February 2026 - 1st of March 2026
- We have reached 1204 proposals submitted, with 168 approved and 45 completed
- We are in the last few week before wrapping up the active phase of the program
- We are working toward an impact report, that we plan to publish in the next few weeks
- We are actively discussing with the OAT a possible continuation of the program under the OpCo
1 Like
Hi, I hope this type of post is okay here. I submitted a Dev Tooling proposal on March 9th for the PACT Protocol (an agent-to-agent escrow and payment system on Arbitrum) and haven’t heard anything back yet. Just want to make sure it didn’t get lost in the shuffle, especially with the program winding down.
I understand @Juandi and @Erezedor are my guys! The contracts are already deployed and working on Arbitrum One, so happy to answer any questions or provide additional info if needed. Proposal ID is 69af2c2216f9336e4ad2b69f.
Thanks!
1 Like
Hey!
We are still evaluating the backlog from other proposals, I’ve seen your proposal on Questbook and either Erezedor or I, will take a look into it once we free up our queue.
Best,
Thank you for the update! Please reach out if you need anything
The active phase of the program is now complete
As originally planned, submissions are now officially closed. Over the past year, we received more than 1,200 applications, an outstanding result that reflects the strength and commitment of the Arbitrum community.
Over the coming weeks, the team will finalize the remaining reviews and ensure that any outstanding proposals are properly assessed.
What happens next
- Transition to low-capacity mode
In line with the Tally proposal, the DAs will now focus on reviewing and disbursing milestones for approved projects, as well as supporting grantees with final reports and interviews. - Reporting and impact assessment
The PM will continue producing reports. Following the next monthly update, the DAO can expect a comprehensive Impact Report summarizing the program’s achievements to date.
Over the next six months, reporting cadence and structure may evolve, reflecting the program’s shift away from application flow tracking toward broader accounting and result analysis. - Coordination with the Arbitrum Foundation
We are working closely with the AF to amplify the program’s outcomes and leverage the broader network. This includes sharing information about new Foundation-led initiatives with our grantees and identifying high-potential projects that may benefit from continued support - Reconcile expenses
We are working with the AF to review and reconcile operational expenses incurred over the past year, and projected for the next six months, that were not explicitly included in the original proposal but became necessary to support the program. These costs, primarily related to infrastructure, will be drawn from the unused part of the OpEx budget.
Further news on the future of the program will be shared at the end of the month, alongside the final monthly report of the active phase.
2 Likes