I voted no. Like Entropy said, its too vague with inflated costs. When I commented on this last week I thought it was gonna be meditated and refined before going to snapshot. That Program Design & Development line - 10k just to figure out what to do? I thought we were doing that on the forums. I get that work needs funds but at least outline the plan first. I’d love to see proposals with more meat before approval, not just “we’ll figure it out later”. Arbitrum needs efficient spending, not blank checks for good intentions because that kills token value.
I also want to echo the sentiment of limiting spending this year. I’d love us to focus first on the Mission and values of Arbitrum - that initiative is already started and when we are clear on how Arbitrum will support Ethereum then we have a purpose to make decisions and it will be easier to make proposals and also to vote.