I’ve been boots on the ground for years. Your assumption here is not accurate.
I am not asking for us to wait for the feedback. I’m saying we can do things in parallel. We can both work on the short-term “triage” solution and create a higher quality understanding of the problem.
A huge part of DAO inefficiencies has been from “building the wrong thing”. This is because there generally isn’t a good discovery phase leading into many projects. This is a problem in web 2 startups as well. How many millions have been wasted building solutions to the wrong problem or ones that people won’t use?
As with all business, relationships matter. Many of us have spent time building relationships in the space. I’m sure between 660,000 token holders we can find one or two projects who would be willing to open up. Not necessarily on a forum.
They have before.
Exactly this. I agree completely. This is a complex, not a complicated problem. Therefore, we should minimize long-term decisions and maximize our ability to quickly sense and respond to a changing environment. A framework isn’t a long-term decision. It is a set of guidlines, roles, and responsibilities that allow the DAO to quickly respond in effective ways.
Hard agree here.
Taking action in the short-term & building frameworks that allow for quick and effective decision making in the future are not waterfall processes. These can happen at the same time! Parallel Processing ftw!
Example 1 - Liquidity Incentive Working Group