We support the SOS proposal for its structured approach to setting strategic objectives that said, What do you think about establishing a working group for delegates to collaboratively brainstorm and develop strategic objectives? We’d love to hear your thoughts on this approach and understand why you believe empowering individual contributors to submit proposals might be more effective. While empowering individual contributors to propose objectives is valuable, it risks creating fragmentation across categories, leading to misaligned or siloed efforts. A working group composed of diverse stakeholders—such as delegates, developers, and researchers—could collect input from the community, synthesize insights, and propose a unified strategic objectives matrix. This would ensure objectives are cohesive, reflective of the DAO’s diverse expertise, and aligned with its overarching mission and vision. For example, the ARB Staking Working Group successfully brought community members together to collaboratively research on staking approach for Arbitrum, demonstrating how shared resources and collective efforts can achieve more effective outcome. Applying a similar approach to the SOS proposal would be highly beneficial, as it would allow everyone to pool their resources and work together toward a shared vision.
and one more question on the snapshot voting, to clarity how the snapshot stragy work, will us delegate pick the best one or divided in percent