We have voted in FAVOUR of the proposal on Snapshot. While there are areas that could be further refined, we believe the core framework is sound and should proceed through the governance process.
Our earlier feedback can be viewed at:
Thank you @Entropy for your well thought-out proposal and all the comments you have made to the feedback so far. Apologies for us coming in a bit late to discussion period here.
We at Castle Labs strongly support the Strategic Objective Setting (SOS) framework and view it as a pivotal step toward empowering the Arbitrum DAO to operate with a structured, proactive, and decentralized governance process.
Below, we outline our general position on the SOS pathway:
Alignment with MVP: The SOS pr…
Thank you @Entropy , for addressing some of our concerns.
vote on Snapshot .
The following minor edits were implemented on January 23rd:
Added clarifying language to indicate that previously chosen, not yet achieved objectives/key results will remain active during a Review/Ad Hoc Strategic Objective Adjustments Phase to ensure continuity, replaced only once a new objectives matrix has been selected through a dedicated voting process. I.e., unless the DAO votes to remove its objectives, the continuity of the SOS is ensured…