Proposal: [Constitutional] AIP: Automate Timeboost Proceeds Split
Type: Off-chain
Vote: FOR
Rationale: This proposal seeks to automate the distribution of Timeboost bid proceeds on Arbitrum One and Arbitrum Nova, implementing a fee splitter contract that routes 97% of proceeds to the DAO Treasury and 3% to the Arbitrum Developer Guild, while also distributing the 3% share that has accrued since Timeboost activation. Automating this split removes the need for repeated 30-day onchain governance cycles to execute a distribution that was already ratified, and the underlying contracts have been audited. Therefore, we are voting FOR this proposal.
Proposal: AGV Wind-Down: Structured Transition & Return of Capital to the DAO Treasury
Type: Off-chain
Vote: FOR
Rationale: This proposal seeks to wind down Arbitrum Gaming Ventures (AGV) as an active investment program, return approximately 143.7 million ARB in undeployed capital to the DAO treasury, and delegate oversight of the remaining portfolio to the Arbitrum OpCo Foundation. Given that the AGV team, OpCo, and the Arbitrum Foundation have collectively determined that the program no longer aligns with the DAO’s current strategic priorities, a structured wind-down is the most responsible path, as it preserves value for existing portfolio companies while returning surplus capital for redeployment. Therefore, we are voting FOR this proposal.
Proposal: Fast Feed: Constitutional AIP
Type: Off-chain
Vote: FOR
Rationale: This proposal seeks to establish the Fast Feed, a paid, authenticated data streaming product on Arbitrum One that gives subscribers earlier access to ordered transaction data via an audited payment contract, with 97% of proceeds routed to the ArbitrumDAO Treasury and 3% to the Arbitrum Developer Guild. The design is ordering-neutral and non-exclusionary since it does not alter transaction sequencing or fees and remains open to any paying subscriber, while converting existing latency-driven value into transparent, on-chain DAO revenue consistent with the precedent set by Timeboost. Therefore, we are voting FOR this proposal.
OAT Elections
Type: Off-chain
Vote: Multichoice
Rationale: We voted for the below applicants, based on our view of their experience and historical contributions to the Arbitrum ecosystem:
- Max Lomu
- Federico Holzwarth
- Pedro Breuer
- Patrick McCorry
- Varit Ruangsiri
- Alex Netto
- Rika Goldberg
- Tom Berry
- Jojo
- AJ Warner
Proposal: [Constitutional] AIP: Ratification of Security Council Election Process Improvements
Vote: FOR
Rationale: This proposal seeks to ratify four Security Council election process improvements, namely extending the cohort duration from one year to two years, lowering the Nominee Selection qualification threshold from 0.2% to 0.1% of votable ARB, and enabling both candidates and sitting members to rotate their Security Council keys. We’ve reviewed these proposed changes and consider them acceptable. Therefore, we are voting FOR this proposal.
Proposal: Constitutional AIP: ArbOS61 Elara Upgrade
Vote: FOR
Rationale: This proposal seeks to upgrade Arbitrum One and Arbitrum Nova to ArbOS 61 Elara, introducing a 96 KB code size limit for Stylus contracts, a time-limited delegation to Offchain Labs to adjust the minimum L2 base fee within a defined 0.01 to 0.10 gwei range, a bug fix to gas refund logic, and several optional features left disabled on the DAO’s chains. The proposed changes are technical improvements, have been audited and come at to cost to the DAO. Therefore, we are voting FOR this proposal.