Constitutional - Extend Delay on L2Time Lock

[Euphoria]

The following reflects the views of the Lampros Labs DAO governance team, composed of @Blueweb, @Euphoria, and Hirangi Pandya (@Nyx), based on our combined research, analysis, and ideation.

We are voting FOR this proposal in Tally Voting.

Increasing the timelock delay for core upgrades is a positive advancement that reflects the current path L2s are taking. Rest our overall thoughts remain the same as expressed in our rationale during the Snapshot voting.

@Euphoria

The following reflects the views of the Lampros Labs DAO governance team, composed of @Blueweb, @Euphoria, and @Nyx, based on our combined research and analysis.

We vote in favour of this proposal.

The proposed increase in the timelock delay for core upgrades is a positive step, aligning with the direction L2s are moving towards. This change follows L2Beat’s recommendations, and the shift from red to yellow status is a good signal for Arbitrum.

We went through the L2Beat website and noticed that zkSync Lite already has a yellow slice, so joining them in this status would be beneficial.

We also believe it’s important to define emergency situations clearly and as much as possible with current knowledge. This will help the Security Council make more informed and deterministic decisions when needed.