Lampros DAO Delegate Communication Thread

[Euphoria]

Snapshot Votes

---

1. [Non-Constitutional] Whitelist Infura Nova Validator
   Voted - FOR
   Reason -

@Euphoria

The following reflects the views of the Lampros Labs DAO governance team, composed of @Blueweb, @Euphoria, and Hirangi Pandya (@Nyx), based on our combined research, analysis, and ideation.

We are voting FOR this proposal.

We understand that adding more validators, especially with proven uptime like Infura, is beneficial for the network’s security and reliability, and this step was long overdue.

We want to highlight the questions raised during the initial proposal discussion and would like further clarification on those.

@Blueweb

@Argonaut

However, we think it would be beneficial to establish clear criteria and a transparent process for whitelisting validators in the future and a method to avoid these oversights.

We want to raise the point of a transparent process of whitelisting validators and also what the compensation paid for whitelisted validators vs an organisation running the validator without it.

Is there any specific performance uptime for staying whitelisted? Can a whitelisted member be delisted for any particular reasons?

---

2. Research on context and retention
   Voted - FOR
   Reason -

@Euphoria

The following reflects the views of the Lampros Labs DAO governance team, composed of @Blueweb, @Euphoria, and Hirangi Pandya (@Nyx), based on our combined research, analysis, and ideation.

We are voting FOR this proposal.

Though the proposal has no associated costs, the potential benefits of the study could be highly valuable. The requested data is publicly available on the forum, and while concerns about Discord’s privacy policy have been noted, we’ve seen many DAOs provide similar access for community-driven projects. The fact that TogetherCrew is already an active member of the DAO gives us confidence that this data will be used for the greater good of the community.

---

3. An EIP-4824 powered daoURI for Arbitrum DAO
   Voted - FOR – Use ENS txt records
   Reason -

@Euphoria

The following reflects the views of the Lampros Labs DAO governance team, composed of @Blueweb, @Euphoria, and Hirangi Pandya (@Nyx), based on our combined research, analysis, and ideation.

We are voting FOR this proposal to use ENS txt records.

Initially, we voted Against it when it was on Snapshot after GovHack Brussels, but based on the security report by ARDC Security Member, there are no risks, and this will improve on-chain transparency of DAO data.

EIP-4824 is a well-designed standard for managing DAO data, making it easier for participants and tooling providers to access recommended sources. This has been a challenge for us in our Chora Club development.

We suggest clarifying the additional costs related to Pathway 1 before the Tally proposal. If the foundation manages updates, the costs should be made transparent to the DAO, possibly by adding the role to an existing council.

The ENS txt record updates are a good starting point, with the option to deploy a contract later if needed.

---

Tally Votes

---

1. September 2024 Nominee Selection Phase
   Here are our Nominees -

   • John Morrow
   • Chuy Garcia
   • Griff Green
   • Dennison Bertram
   • Cyfrin

   Reason -

@Euphoria

The following reflects the views of the Lampros Labs DAO governance team, composed of @Blueweb, @Euphoria, and Hirangi Pandya (@Nyx), based on our combined research, analysis, and ideation.

Here are our Nominees for the Security Council.

Based on Arbitrum alignment, availability, reputation, expertise, competence & their intro during the call to know the members, we nominate the following members for the Security Council Election.

• John Morrow
• Chuy Garcia
• Griff Green
• Dennison Bertram
• Cyfrin

---

2. UPDATED - Ethereum Protocol Attackathon Sponsorship
   Voted - FOR
   Reason -

@Euphoria

The following reflects the views of the Lampros Labs DAO governance team, composed of @Blueweb, @Euphoria, and Hirangi Pandya (@Nyx), based on our combined research, analysis, and ideation.

We are voting FOR this proposal in Tally voting.

Supporting this proposal shows Arbitrum’s commitment to the Ethereum ecosystem. Additionally, we support the decision that the Arbitrum DAO should back this as Panda Partners, as the DAO has voted to become Panda Partners with 30 ETH during the Snapshot voting.

Rest our overall thoughts remain the same as expressed in our rationale during the Snapshot voting.

@Euphoria

Lampros Labs DAO currently supports this proposal to sponsor the Ethereum Protocol Attackathon as it directly benefits the security and reliability of the Ethereum protocol, which is crucial for the Arbitrum ecosystem.

We support this proposal and believe this approach would demonstrate Arbitrum’s commitment to the Ethereum ecosystem.

These thoughts are collectively presented by @Blueweb, @Euphoria & @Nyx under the Lampros Labs DAO delegate.

---

3. [NON-CONSTITUTIONAL] Arbitrum DAO Procurement Committee: Phase II Proposal
   Voted - FOR
   Reason -

@Euphoria

The following reflects the views of the Lampros Labs DAO governance team, composed of @Blueweb, @Euphoria, and Hirangi Pandya (@Nyx), based on our combined research, analysis, and ideation.

We are voting FOR this proposal in the Tally voting.

The changes made by @sid_areta from the Snapshot to the Tally proposal have provided better clarity to the proposal. Aside from these updates, our overall thoughts remain the same as expressed in our rationale during the Snapshot voting.

---

4. Constitutional AIP - Extend Delay on L2Time Lock
   Voted - FOR
   Reason -

@Euphoria

The following reflects the views of the Lampros Labs DAO governance team, composed of @Blueweb, @Euphoria, and Hirangi Pandya (@Nyx), based on our combined research, analysis, and ideation.

We are voting FOR this proposal in Tally Voting.

Increasing the timelock delay for core upgrades is a positive advancement that reflects the current path L2s are taking. Rest our overall thoughts remain the same as expressed in our rationale during the Snapshot voting.