Those are easy words to say behind a screen 
respect. We are here helping each other.
Here is where you could had misunderstood my words. I wouldn’t call this proposal failing; I would call it winning but not passing.
That’s a winning proposal without enough people looking into it. The moment other folks look into it and abstain, they are communicating that they don’t have the expertise/time to look into it in the detail it deserves and are trusting the people who are voting to decide. If the majority of voters vote no, that proposal will not pass.
And what you are proposing is to remove quorum from abstain votes, which honestly makes no sense. There are technical decisions where I personally do not want to participate, but I don’t want to block the decision from happening via quorum.