The following reflects the views of the Lampros DAO governance team, composed of Chain_L (@Blueweb) and @Euphoria, based on our combined research, analysis, and ideation.
We are voting FOR this proposal in the Tally voting.
We see this vote as a straightforward step to let $BORING integrate with Arbitrum using the generic-custom gateway. This helps Superboring grow and lets users confidently interact with the correct token, reducing confusion or risk of imitations. From a technical perspective, this is simply aligning two contracts for safe bridging, without introducing any new risk to existing systems or the DAO treasury.
As we’ve said before, requiring a formal DAO vote for each technical mapping like this is not the most efficient use of community effort. Projects like Superboring want to ship real adoption and volume; waiting for a governance cycle makes the experience harder for builders and does not make the network safer. We agree with other delegates that technical reviews and audits, not repeated DAO-wide votes, should set the bar for routine gateway actions.
We also appreciate recent steps to address this, like the launch of the Maintenance Upgrades Working Group led by @krst. We hope this initiative results in a smoother and more predictable path for operational upgrades or routine actions like token registration, so that governance is focused on the highest value issues while technical experts keep our infrastructure safe.
This update is positive for the Arbitrum ecosystem, poses low risk, and supports a well-established project.