[Tally] Front-end Interface to Force Transaction Inclusion During Sequencer Downtime
Voted: For
We were happy to support this proposal during the onchain vote as it provides a quick fix during sequencer downtimes.
[Snapshot] Set up a Sub-Committee for the Security Services Subsidy Fund
Voted: Against
The ADPC was willing to take on this responsibility so there was no need — at least right now — to create this sub-committee.
[Snapshot] AIP: Nova Fee Router Proposal (ArbOS 30)
Voted: For
This proposal will automate the transfer process of funds accrued from transaction fees on Nova to the DAO’s treasury. We were happy to support it.
[Tally] Catalyze Gaming Ecosystem Growth on Arbitrum
Voted: Against
We weren’t in support of the requested funding and the projected timeline for deliverables.
[Snapshot] AIP: Activate Stylus and Enable Next-Gen WebAssembly Smart Contracts (ArbOS 30)
Voted: For
Interoperability, preferred languages, and more. It was an easy yes for us.
[Snapshot] AIP: Support RIP-7212 for Account Abstraction Wallets (ArbOS 30)
Voted: For
A healthy user security improvement. This was a welcome initiative we were happy to support.
[Tally] Constitutional AIP - Security Council Improvement Proposal
Voted: For
We were in favor of increasing the number of seats to 9/12.
[Tally] ArbitrumDAO Contribution; Safeguarding Software Developers’ Rights
Voted: For
We were happy to support this proposal during the temp check and now during the onchain vote.
[Snapshot] Election of STEP Program Manager
Voted: 100% for Steakhouse
They are very knowledgeable on RWA monitoring and have dipped their feet in the Arbitrum waters, offering services to several protocols within Arbitrum so we were happy to support them.
[Snapshot] [NON-CONSTITUTIONAL] Pilot Phase: Arbitrum Ventures Initiative
Voted: For [No IRL Event]
We were generally in support of this initiative but against funding the IRL event.
[Snapshot] AIP: BoLD - permissionless validation for Arbitrum
Voted: For (in all three proposals)
As we look to achieving Stage 2, we were pleased to support this upgrade along with associated bond and op cost sentiment.
[Snapshot] Pilot Stage – Treasury Backed Vaults research and development
Voted: Against
While the proposal shows promise, we believe the Snapshot vote was rushed and were generally against it as is.
[Snapshot] [Non-Constitutional] Betting on Builders: Infinite Launchpad Proposal
Voted: Against
It is definitely a good initiative. However, we had some concerns and this potentially resulted in us voting against.
[Tally] Kwenta x Perennial: Arbitrum Onboarding Incentives
Voted: Abstain
We maintained our vote from the temp check sighting the same rationale we had with Curve.
[Snapshot] ArbitrumHub Evolution: The Next Step in Streamlining Information Access and Raising Awareness for Arbitrum DAO
Voted: Against
We strongly resonated with the concern from delegates regarding the proposed cost so we voted against this proposal in its current form.
[Snapshot] Multisig Support Service (MSS) Elections
There were several qualified candidates so we decided to go with those with experience in Arbitrum and those we have been involved with in some degree both in Arbitrum and across other DAOs. They were:
- Limes.eth
- Griff Green
- JoJo
- Alex “Slobo.eth” Slobodnik
- Feems
- Sinkas
- Disruption Joe
- Frisson
- DAOplomats