November 2024
[Snapshot] Adopt a Delegate Code of Conduct & Formalize Operations
Voted: FOR
A code of conduct fosters better transparency in the community. We supported this proposal during the temp check.
[Tally] (V2) Arbitrum Research & Development Collective
Voted: FOR
We maintained our support from the temp check.
[Tally] Establishing a DAO Events Budget for 2025
Voted: FOR
We supported this proposal during temp check and maintained our stance for the onchain vote.
[Snapshot] [Non-Constitutional] Treasury Management v1.2
Voted: FOR
There have been discussions and more recently a proposal that highlighted the need to address insufficient ARB holdings covering agreed-upon rates. To mitigate these sorts of issues in the future, treasury management would come in handy. Hence, we supported this.
[Snapshot] Restitution For Extensively Delayed ArbitrumDAO Minigrant Winners
Voted: AGAINST
We were against this proposal as we would love to preserve process integrity.
[Snapshot] Hackathon Continuation Program
Voted: In favor, no onchain mechanism
A process to sustain ongoing hackathon projects is good so we were in favor of this proposal. We also voted for no onchain mechanism to reduce administrative overhead
.
.
.
December 2024
[Snapshot] [Non-consitutional] User Research: Why build on Arbitrum?
Voted: Researching within Arbitrum only
We are generally in support of more narrowed-down research so we voted in favor of conducting one within the Arbitrum DAO only.
[Snapshot] Designing and operating the reporting and information function
Voted: Against
Alex Lumley mentioned he would be dialing in more details to the proposal so we voted against it during the temp check.
[Snapshot] Arbitrum D.A.O. Domain Allocator Offerings) Grant Program - Season 3
Voted: Renew with 5 domains
We are really pleased with the D.A.O. initiative and all the work that has been done. We are also excited to see a fifth domain added so we voted in favor during the temp check.
[Snapshot] [NON-CONSTITUTIONAL] Arbitrum Onboarding V2: A Governance Bootcamp
Voted: For
We agree some parts of the proposal still need to be fleshed out but we are supportive of the initiative and decided to signal early support by voting in favor.
[Snapshot] ARDC (V2) Elections
Voted
Communications Role
We split our vote evenly between @Frisson @pedrob @jameskbh. Very present individuals who have demonstrated they are capable of fulfilling the obligations of this role.
Research
Here, we voted for Blockwork Advisory. They have been strong supporters of the Arbitrum community doing valuable work, most recently, their Timeboost analysis.
Risk
For risk, we voted for @VendingMachine. Very committed team, and with the work they put into the staking WG, we are pretty confident they would deliver well here too.
Security
Voted for @openzeppelin in this category. Solid work background within Arbitrum DAO generally but most especially along the ARDC lines. Also, good action items for V2.
[Snapshot] Unifying Arbitrum’s Mission, Vision, Purpose (MVP)
Voted: For
This is much needed and with the window to continuously iterate for six months, we were happy to support this proposal during the temp check.
[Snapshot] Partner with ETH Bucharest 2025
Voted: Against
We have a structure and plan for events in 2025 and would prefer the DAO to stick to that rather than spend separately on this. For this reason, we voted against during the temp check.
[Snapshot] OpCo – A DAO-adjacent Entity for Strategy Execution
Voted: For
We were in favor of this proposal as it introduces a better structure for the community.
[Tally] Arbitrum Hackathon Builder Continuation Program
Voted: For
We maintained our support from the temp check as we believe this is net positive for the DAO.
[Tally] Treasury Management V1.2
Voted: For
We voted in favor of this proposal during the onchain vote as we did during the temp check.