Name Harps
Wallet: 0xc8d1cbAe5dc3a0E2e6c68b375Ba0061eE86FFD23
Tally profile: Tally | Harps
Areas I would be interested in: Improving Governance Participation and IRL Arbitrum community gathering
Issue 1 - Against as too much power in one entity is dangerous and open to manipulation. I would change the proposal so flipside be represented only on one committee with preference on allocation
There is a fine balance to be had deciding whether to go centralisation and ability to get things done. It is always best to get things done when in critical situation as something even the smallest of things can become a major talking point when discussed at length,
Issue 2 - I would do with full reimbursement if the companies finances can sustain it. It is always better for the entity to not lose the confidence of its consumers, If they were exploited and the clients were not reimbursed then the future clients would lose confidence which will affect the future trade
Languages: English
Conflict(s) of Interest: None
Thank you for taking time to read, don’t hesitate to ask any questions.