Name Serhii (individ)
Adress
0x0ce60838c7bda6993ce980ee0013f4de9232f1c9
Areas of interest:
- Improving Governance participation
- Supporting Infrastructure
- Tooling, Improving protocol decentralization
Please share your stance on overall goals for the DAO:
As a prospective delegate for the DAO Arbitrum blockchain, my overall goal is to promote the growth and development of the community while ensuring that the interests of all members are represented. To achieve this, I believe that the DAO should prioritize initiatives that foster liquidity and encourage participation from a diverse range of stakeholders.
While liquidity mining can be a powerful tool for incentivizing participation and building momentum, I believe that it should be approached cautiously and with a long-term perspective. In my view, the primary goal of the DAO should be to create a sustainable and resilient ecosystem that can weather market fluctuations and adapt to changing conditions.
Regarding the issues that have been raised in other communities, I believe that it’s important to take a proactive and collaborative approach to addressing concerns and building trust. By engaging with members of other communities in a respectful and constructive manner, we can cultivate a culture of cooperation and mutual benefit that benefits everyone involved.
Ultimately, my stance on these issues is guided by a commitment to transparency, inclusivity, and responsible stewardship of the resources and assets entrusted to the DAO. As a delegate, I would work tirelessly to ensure that the community’s interests are represented and that the DAO continues to thrive and grow over the long term.
Sample Voting Issue 1:
As a delegate, I would vote against the Uniswap proposal as it currently stands. While I believe that bounties can be an effective way to attract new users to Uniswap, the proposal gives Flipside crypto too much control over the allocation of UNI and oversight of the program. In my view, this could lead to centralization of power and create an unfair advantage for Flipside.
Sample Voting Issue 2:
As a delegate, I believe that the Rari hack reimbursement situation is a complex issue that requires careful consideration and a nuanced approach. While I sympathize with those who were affected by the hack, I believe that it’s important to weigh the potential benefits and drawbacks of reimbursement carefully.
In my view, the decision of whether or not to reimburse parties affected by an exploit should be based on a number of factors, including the severity of the exploit, the impact on the community, and the feasibility of reimbursement. In some cases, full reimbursement may be appropriate if the exploit was particularly damaging or if it was the result of a systemic issue within the platform. However, in other cases, it may not be feasible or appropriate to provide full reimbursement.
Ultimately, I believe that the decision of whether or not to reimburse parties affected by an exploit should be made on a case-by-case basis, taking into account the unique circumstances of each situation. As a delegate, I would work to ensure that the interests of all members of the community are represented fairly and that decisions are made in a transparent and responsible manner.
Languages I speak and write:
Russian (native), English (upper intermediate)
LFG ARBITRUM!
8
Marsv
7h
Name (individual): Majoer Sab
Wallet Address or ENS: 0xc3A94A5e6202968EAF61C642E91Da6123142F98e
Tally Profile URL : Tally | 0xc3A9…F98e
What area are you most interested in contributing to?: NFT development on Arbitrum and Improving Governance participation
Please share your stance on overall goals for the DAO: The DAO`s goal should be distributing all decision making power over as many people as possible and securing the treasury as well as the infrastructure!!!
Sample Voting Issue 1: 1) Against 2) Just cancel it altogether. 3) Voting must be decentralized; execution can be centralized and swift. But power must go to the people…there are no short cuts.
Sample Voting Issue 2: 1) Full Reimbursement, we need turst
Languages I speak and write: English, German.
Disclosure of Conflict(s) of Interest: none
8
last visit
arabianhorses
1
7h
Name: Oguz
ENS: oguzthestoic.eth.
Twitter: oguzthestoic
I have a keen interest in Public Goods Funding, DeFi development, and Tools for gathering data. Regarding liquidity incentives, I think incentives should be use for introduce new platforms to newcomers while also imposing limits on bigger capitals. I believe that the ArbitrumDao should use incentives to promote awareness of Arbitrum-based dApps, and as a result, capital will naturally move in.
Regarding the sample issue, I vote against it. Instead, I suggest improving the proposal by adding solid milestones to the process and transferring an initial amount to Flipside after each milestone is achieved, followed by subsequent portions. This way, we can strike a balance between centralization of authority and the ability to get things done.
I am a native Turkish speaker and proficient in English, while also working to improve my Spanish (currently at A2 level). In terms of my personal interests, I have a background in data analysis (check out my Dune profile!), as well as a passion for Ancient Greek-Roman and Islamic philosophy, electronic dance music, and Russian literature.
Lastly, you can get contact with me on discord my handle is arabianhorses#9592
I wish the best for all delegate candidates and the ecosystem.
6
oxigen
1
7h
Name: ILIA
ENS: uniteco.eth
Tally Profile uniteco.eth
- DeFi development on Arbitrum
- NFT development on Arbitrum
- Gaming development on Arbitrum
Sample Voting Issue 1:
- This proposal flew under the radar but at the 11th hour got very heated. Large votes from university clubs supported the proposal since they would get a seat on the allocation committee. However, Dune and Leshner spoke up about the issue because of the centralization of power and favor of one service provider.
Prompts to Answer:
- How would you vote?
Against
- What amendments would you make to the proposal if any?
- How would you approach the tradeoff between centralization of authority and the ability to get things done?
Sample Voting Issue 2:
Issue Overview
FEI RARI Hack Reimbursement: In April 2022 Rari was hacked for 80M, a vote was passed to reimburse those affected. Then in May 2022 another vote to refund the Rari hacked was brought forward this time it was not passed.
Prompts to Answer:
Outside the flipping of the vote, how would you choose to handle this situation?
i.e should parties be reimbursed for an exploit or not? (Please choose one of the below options and then elaborate upon your reasoning)
- Split Reimbursement
Languages I speak and write: Rus, Eng
4
Trinh
6h
Name: Vinh (Individual)
Address: 0x6F812734385F7C3525d9E5612bEF353ba572D146
Areas of interest:
- Improving Governance participation
- Supporting Infrastructure
- Tooling, Improving protocol decentralization
Please share your stance on overall goals for the DAO:
As a prospective delegate for the DAO Arbitrum blockchain, my overall goal is to promote the growth and development of the community while ensuring that the interests of all members are represented. To achieve this, I believe that the DAO should prioritize initiatives that foster liquidity and encourage participation from a diverse range of stakeholders.
While liquidity mining can be a powerful tool for incentivizing participation and building momentum, I believe that it should be approached cautiously and with a long-term perspective. In my view, the primary goal of the DAO should be to create a sustainable and resilient ecosystem that can weather market fluctuations and adapt to changing conditions.
Regarding the issues that have been raised in other communities, I believe that it’s important to take a proactive and collaborative approach to addressing concerns and building trust. By engaging with members of other communities in a respectful and constructive manner, we can cultivate a culture of cooperation and mutual benefit that benefits everyone involved.
Ultimately, my stance on these issues is guided by a commitment to transparency, inclusivity, and responsible stewardship of the resources and assets entrusted to the DAO. As a delegate, I would work tirelessly to ensure that the community’s interests are represented and that the DAO continues to thrive and grow over the long term.
Sample Voting Issue 1:
As a delegate, I would vote against the Uniswap proposal as it currently stands. While I believe that bounties can be an effective way to attract new users to Uniswap, the proposal gives Flipside crypto too much control over the allocation of UNI and oversight of the program. In my view, this could lead to centralization of power and create an unfair advantage for Flipside.
Sample Voting Issue 2:
As a delegate, I believe that the Rari hack reimbursement situation is a complex issue that requires careful consideration and a nuanced approach. While I sympathize with those who were affected by the hack, I believe that it’s important to weigh the potential benefits and drawbacks of reimbursement carefully.
In my view, the decision of whether or not to reimburse parties affected by an exploit should be based on a number of factors, including the severity of the exploit, the impact on the community, and the feasibility of reimbursement. In some cases, full reimbursement may be appropriate if the exploit was particularly damaging or if it was the result of a systemic issue within the platform. However, in other cases, it may not be feasible or appropriate to provide full reimbursement.
Ultimately, I believe that the decision of whether or not to reimburse parties affected by an exploit should be made on a case-by-case basis, taking into account the unique circumstances of each situation. As a delegate, I would work to ensure that the interests of all members of the community are represented fairly and that decisions are made in a transparent and responsible manner.
Languages I speak and write:
VietNam (native), English (upper intermediate)
LFG ARBITRUM!
3
666
6h
Name (organization or individual)
Nolan West
Wallet Address or ENS
opvault.eth
0x83dE3EC8d53b73B4EEE277f73a3F7D49171cb6f5
Tally Profile URL: * Tally | opvault.eth
What area are you most interested in contributing to?
- NFT development on Arbitrum
- Improving Governance participation
Please share your stance on overall goals for the DAO:
- I do not care about liquidity mining. Bribing people to use X means X is useless. We aggressively build stuff that people NEED instead.
Sample Voting Issue 1:
- Against
- No amendments, just cancel it altogether.
- The solution is reputational avatars, which solves most if not all DAO participation and token-weight voting problems.
Sample Voting Issue 2:
It depends entirely where the reimbursement would come from. If this were a case of introducing a self-executable on-chain transfer block on the hacked amount and reminting into the damaged parties’ accounts, I would vote yes. If the tokenholders and other network participants were to pay for this, no. Socializing losses across a large number of people is not acceptable when it is clear that very small circles of people are responsible for both insecure code and stealing the money.
Languages I speak and write:
- English, Vietnamese, Japan, Chinese.
Disclosure of Conflict(s) of Interest:
3
tiistar
6h
[quote=“Lemma, post:1, topic:31”]
Please respond to the submission template below by replying with your answers.
Artem
0xfA63ACA138164cEd380EC59BC7f2D6345bbE628f
Tally | 0xfA63…628f
What area are you most interested in contributing to? choose up tot wo tags:
- Public Goods funding
- NFT development on Arbitrum
Please share your stance on overall goals for the DAO:
Fast decision making. Work together with developers
Prompts to Answer:
- How would you vote?
For
Against
Prompts to Answer:
Outside the flipping of the vote, how would you choose to handle this situation?
i.e should parties be reimbursed for an exploit or not? (Please choose one of the below options and then elaborate upon your reasoning)
- Full Reimbursement
Please elaborate on what instances you believe it is right to refund and which are not.
Languages I speak and write:
English and Russian
3
zhw881122
6h
-
- Arbitrum 上的 DeFi 开发, * 改善治理参与 比较感兴趣
2.*对 DAO 总体目标的立场:
流动性挖矿效率是积极的,增加社区活跃度。
2.全额报销
社区信誉度和社区生死的问题,有人参与社区才能发展,没有流动的社区那是独角戏
3
chaffie68
6h
Name (organization or individual)
Wallet Address or ENS
Tally Profile URL (create a profile here )
Tally
DAO memberships, votes and proposal
What area are you most interested in contributing to?
I would say Public Goods funding and Improving Governance participation.
Please share your stance on overall goals for the DAO:
- to increase community involvement and decision-making power, promote decentralization, and enhance the overall functioning and success of the project.
Sample Voting Issue 1:
However, in general, it is important to consider the balance between centralization and efficiency when making decisions. While centralization can enable faster decision-making, it can also lead to power imbalances and decreased community participation. Therefore, any amendments to the proposal should prioritize increasing transparency and community involvement while still allowing for efficient implementation.
Sample Voting Issue 2:
It would depend on the specific circumstances of the hack and the impact on the affected parties. In general, it is important to balance the needs of the affected parties with the overall health and sustainability of the project. Full reimbursement may not always be feasible or sustainable, but partial reimbursement or other forms of compensation may be appropriate in certain cases. Ultimately, any decision should be made with transparency and community input to ensure fairness and accountability.
Languages I speak and write:
Disclosure of Conflict(s) of Interest:
5
aliafroz
6h
MA Crypto
0x91B75Ba14FACcD059889A8Dc84BE10adb50E5360
Tally
DAO memberships, votes and proposals from address 0x91B7…5360
- DeFi development on Arbitrum
- Tooling, Improving protocol decentralization
for
4
Viktorcrypto
6h
Name (organization or individual)
Wallet Address or ENS
Tally Profile URL (create a profile here )
What area are you most interested in contributing to?
- Tooling, Improving protocol decentralization
- IRL Arbitrum community gatherings
Please share your stance on overall goals for the DAO:
- DAO is a key important element in our WEB 3.0. future. Real decentralization and responsible for their decision DAO participants the goal we strive to.
Sample Voting Issue 1:
- Against
- The balance of voting power should be guaranteed.
- Initial equal and fair distribution between active participants, proving more power for useful for DAO actions. Strong DAO participants will be able to keep DAO healthy.
Sample Voting Issue 2:
- Split Reimbursement
Based on contribution, parties involvement, and available funds. Perhaps reimbursing with vesting.
Languages I speak and write:
- English, German, Ukrainian
Disclosure of Conflict(s) of Interest:
3
shin
6h
Tên (tổ chức, cá nhân)
Shinrypto
Địa chỉ ví hoặc ENS
24htime.eth
Tally Profile URL (tạo một hồ sơ tại đây )
Tôi quan tâm đến 02 vấn đề đó là::
- Phát triển DeFi trên Arbitrum
- Cải thiện sự tham gia của quản trị
Lập trường mục tiêu cho DAO:
Chúng ta đã biết rằng: mục đích của DAO là cho phép sự phát triển lành mạnh và phi tập trung của tổng số. Tất nhiên, tầm nhìn này có thể đòi hỏi nhiều khía cạnh khác nhau, từ các phần tập trung vào kỹ thuật và bảo mật hơn của bản cập nhật (mà DAO nên giám sát) để khuyến khích phát triển một hệ sinh thái lành mạnh và tăng trưởng với mã thông báo ARB.
Nhìn chung, các mục tiêu của DAO và cách tiếp cận khai thác thanh khoản phải phù hợp với nhu cầu và ưu tiên của cộng đồng. DAO có thể hưởng lợi từ việc kết hợp phản hồi và đầu vào từ các thành viên cộng đồng để đảm bảo rằng các chiến lược và mục tiêu của họ phản ánh các giá trị và lợi ích của hệ sinh thái rộng lớn hơn.
1.Cho
2.Không có gì hơn
3.Sự đánh đổi giữa tập trung quyền lực và khả năng hoàn thành công việc là một thách thức chung đối với bất kỳ tổ chức nào, bao gồm cả DAO. Một mặt, tập trung quyền lực có thể mang lại khả năng lãnh đạo và ra quyết định rõ ràng, dẫn đến việc thực thi nhanh hơn và sử dụng các nguồn lực hiệu quả hơn. Mặt khác, tập trung hóa quá nhiều có thể kìm hãm sự đổi mới, hạn chế sự tham gia và dẫn đến việc ra quyết định không phản ánh nhu cầu và ưu tiên của cộng đồng rộng lớn hơn.
4
moeen
6h
- ETH Address: 0xbd9f70E2B1D741b4925c36A0315A5a9aC26BE776
- ENS: moeen.eth
- Twitter: @moeendoteth
Web3 believer, NFT, Crypto, Tech Nerd, Mac Expert, Drone Pilot, Photographer
I am a creative/passion-driven soul, art lover, and tech nerd, also heavily into Web3, NFT, and Cryptocurrency. I have a strong working and conceptional knowledge of all non-coding areas of the ecosystem such as Web3, layer 2, Blockchain, NFTs, Trading, DEFI, Smart Contracts, ETF, etc.; I follow news and developments daily and have concepts worked out in detail for projects, and also have some knowledge of coding parts, building and actively participating in different blockchain-related projects for the past one year, besides this I research and find new NFT/Crypto projects and their potential so I can HOLD or Trade them. I actively create content on Twitter and Youtube, covering news, and introducing new platforms, guides, and how-tos. I was a Mod in different discord servers and an alpha caller in our private group. I see our future in Web3.
4
elbocca
6h
Name : Nikita elbocca
Wallet Address 0x7F7Efe1A462A3758d6A21BD5205D77DF544203Dc
Tally
DAO memberships, votes and proposal
What area are you most interested in contributing to? choose up tot wo tags:
- Gaming development on Arbitrum
- Supporting Infrastructure
Regarding the overall goals of the DAO, it depends on the DAO’s specific objectives and priorities. Still, generally speaking, the primary goal of a DAO is to enable decentralized decision-making and collective ownership, where members can participate in decision-making processes and have a say in how the DAO operates.
Regarding liquidity mining, the aggressiveness of the strategy will depend on the DAO’s resources, objectives, and risk tolerance. Liquidity mining can be an effective way to incentivize users to provide liquidity to the DAO’s pools, but it also carries risks, such as impermanent loss and volatility.
Regarding the voting issue, if I were a member of the DAO, I would consider the potential risks and benefits of the proposal and vote accordingly. If I believed that the proposal would benefit the DAO and its users, I would vote for it. Still, if I had concerns about the centralization of power and the favoring of one service provider over others, I would vote against it or propose amendments to address these concerns.
Regarding amendments to the proposal, I would suggest reducing the amount of control given to Flipside and increasing the involvement of other analytics service providers. For example, instead of having Flipside control the allocation committee, the DAO could establish a more decentralized approach that involves multiple service providers.
Regarding the tradeoff between centralization of authority and the ability to get things done, it’s essential to find a balance that ensures effective decision-making without compromising the DAO’s decentralized structure. One approach is to distribute decision-making power among multiple stakeholders and establish clear guidelines and processes for decision-making. Additionally, transparency and accountability are crucial to ensure that all members have a say in how the DAO operates.
3
isavazh