Title: Dispute
Reason for dispute:
I would love to understnad why my comments on the Partner with ETH Bucharest 2025 - Eastern Europe’s Leading Ethereum Conference and Hackathon proposal were not considered valid and taken into account.
Specifically I would like to argue that my final comment in that proposal, was actually relevant, timely, required a bit of analysis and also had impact in the sense that it shows how and why the proposal was considered passed and that it should be funded through the 2025 Events Budget.
Also, regarding my comment above, I’m not sure if the presence multiplier is being calculated correctly because the list of proposals included doesn’t seem right.
Thank you!