We are proud to announce the initial outcomes of the second month of the Delegate Incentive Program. After completing the second month of the program, we can now share both results and conclusions with the Arbitrum ecosystem.
April Participants
For April’s iteration of the program, 44 participants enrolled, out of which 42 met the necessary requirements to qualify.
You can see the full list here.
Parameters Breakdown
Snapshot Voting
During the month there were a total of 79 Snapshot Votations, which were considered for the assignment of scores by SV, it is important to note that only those proposals that ended in April were counted. These are the proposals that were taken into account:
- 76 LTIPP Votations.
- Delegate to Voter Enfranchisement Pool — Event Horizon
- Subsidy Fund for Security Services
- Safeguarding Software Developers’ Rights & the Right to Privacy
Tally Voting
Also, for this month there were a total of 4 Tally Votations that were considered for TV scoring, it is important to note that only those proposals that ended in April were counted. These are the proposals that were considered:
- Arbitrum Stable Treasury Endowment Program
- Empowering Early Contributors: The community Arbiter Proposal 2.0
- Expand Tally Support for the Arbitrum DAO
- Request for Continuation of the Arbitrum DDA Program Request
Communication Rationale
As stated in our forum post, LTIPP Rationales won’t be taken into consideration for this month.
For the CR, the published rationals of all the votes of the month were considered, taking into account Snapshot and Tally, that is to say that to obtain the maximum qualification in this aspect a delegate had to express his rational of all the votes of the month, in other words 7 (3 Snapshot + 4 Tally).
Commenting in proposals (3 CPs)
Only 3 proposals were considered. These proposals were the ones that went through Snapshot.
April Results
You can see the dashboard with the results implemented by Karma here.
Of all the participating delegates, 30 were eligible to receive compensation.
| Delegate | Address | Snapshot Profile | Tally Profile | PARB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L2BEAT | 0x1B686eE8E31c5959D9F5BBd8122a58682788eeaD | LINK | Profile L2beat | 5.000,00 |
| BlockworksResearch | 0xA5dF0cf3F95C6cd97d998b9D990a86864095d9b0 | LINK | BlockworksResearch Profile | 4.880,00 |
| GFXLabs | 0xa6e8772af29b29B9202a073f8E36f447689BEef6 | LINK | GFX Labs Profile | 4.807,50 |
| 404 DAO | 0xe93d59cc0bcecfd4ac204827ef67c5266079e2b5 | LINK | 404 Profile | 4.750,00 |
| PrincetonBlockchain | 0x18BF1a97744539a348304E9d266aAc7d446a1582 | LINK | PrincetonBlockchain Profile | 4.750,00 |
| cp0x | 0x6f9BB7e454f5B3eb2310343f0E99269dC2BB8A1d | LINK | cp0x Profile | 4.710,00 |
| Bob-Rossi | 0xb29A655f3D67B2B6724Fb22B2C2303cB660c946B | LINK | Bob Rossi Profile | 4.670,00 |
| mcfly | 0xAfD5f60aA8eb4F488eAA0eF98c1C5B0645D9A0A0 | LINK | mcfly profile | 4.630,00 |
| DAOplomats | 0xd4879f876eE383067F80ACAdBE283B93141908e9 | LINK | DAOplomats | 4.630,00 |
| UADP | 0x8326D18edfC50B4335113C33b25116ec268FF3fE | LINK | UADP Profile | 4.580,00 |
| Angela | 0xa19a11CB5928Bf07B5B6aBa256F63142343A59bc | LINK | ocandocrypto.eth Profile | 4.460,00 |
| Savvy DeFi | 0x4f54Cab19B61138e3c622a0bD671C687481eC030 | LINK | Savvy DeFi Profile | 4.393,54 |
| Blue Clarity | 0x560b03B06eF02B24F994e470d949008cda5e1841 | LINK | BlueClarity Profile | 4.390,09 |
| Jojo | 0x4f685b29514eed0c9d929386e86d9cd81981118b | LINK | Jojo Profile | 4,330.00 |
| Frisson | 0xb5B069370Ef24BC67F114e185D185063CE3479f8 | LINK | Frisson Profile | 4.141,50 |
| BristolBlockchain | 0x43D3938Ebd74106e2d177f9A304C1E9f914f2b52 | LINK | BristolBlockchain Profile | 4.130,00 |
| Ruslan Klinkov | 0xC3e8aC233f02d13C1E299e47aE230C205E0177Ed | LINK | Ruslan Profile | 4.097,65 |
| Bobbay | 0x5a35923ed6950eff4412ef6d27cea8b1d405a844 | LINK | Bobbay Profile | 4.080,00 |
| TreasureDAO | 0x0eB5B03c0303f2F47cD81d7BE4275AF8Ed347576 | LINK | TreasureDAO Profile | 4.035,71 |
| 0xCasio | 0x47E98aA12dB2017295d33e94002521820442F827 | LINK | 0xCasio profile | 3.991,43 |
| Premia (DK) | 0xAD16ebE6FfC7d96624A380F394cD64395B0C6144 | LINK | Premia (DK) Profile | 3,940.09 |
| Kuiqian.eth | 0xf3FE8c6c75bE4afB2F8200Fc77339abE4D7CFF33 | LINK | Kuiqian Profile | 3,714.29 |
| MaxLomu | 0xd333Bc5c9670C9cEb18f9A2CF02C6E86807a8227 | LINK | MaxLomu Profile | 3,691.79 |
| Ermia | 0x8e22a4c2901da99777d76f80f29640fc81ae96bb | LINK | Ermia Profile | 3,554.79 |
| StableLab | 0xea172676E4105e92Cc52DBf45fD93b274eC96676 | LINK | StableLab Profile | 3,504.29 |
| NathanVDH | 0xf9551c66995ed3ff9bb05c9fd7ff148bd75dc99a | LINK | NathanVDH Profile | 3,373.30 |
| olimpio | 0xF4B0556B9B6F53E00A1FDD2b0478Ce841991D8fA | LINK | olimpo Profile | 3,357.14 |
| 0x_ultra | 0x539629494be6b004d33d290e6243806750a3a2f4 | LINK | 0x_Ultra Profile | 3,347.65 |
| Penn Blockchain | 0x070341aA5Ed571f0FB2c4a5641409B1A46b4961b | LINK | Penn Blockchain Profile | 3,164.32 |
| Griff Green | 0x839395e20bbB182fa440d08F850E6c7A8f6F0780 | LINK | Griff Green Profile | 3.129,08 |
| Total | 124.234,16 |
Bonus Points
For the month of April there were certain proposals that were candidates for the allocation of Bonus Points.
These proposals were reviewed in detail in order to comply with the rules expressed in this thread, where we clarify that:
Based on the above and after the review, we conclude that the only proposal that meets the necessary requirements for the allocation of Bonus Points is:
This proposal is born from two different forum posts:
- Proposal [Non-Constitutional]: Defending Open Source: A United Stand for Developer Rights and Software Freedom
- Proposal [Non-Constitutional]: Funding DAO Legal Defence and Advocacy with Defi Education Fund
The evaluation rubric for BP assignment is as follows:
As it can be visualized, the final result was 24%, which will be the BP assigned to the creator and contributors of the proposal, which were:
- ImmutableLawyer (Member of BlueClarity)
- GFX Labs
Also, 5% Bonus Points were added to those delegates who contributed to uploading LTIPP proposals. These delegates were:
- Frisson
- DK
- L2BEAT
- Princeton Blockchain
Coinflip also uploaded some LTIPP proposals, but he’s not participating in the program.
Costs
The program has several costs associated with it. These are:
Incentives to delegates (APRIL)
According this the results presented before the total cost destined to the delegates will it be 124.234,16 ARB
Karma: 0xc98786d5a7a03c1e74affcb97ff7ef8a710da09b
Multisig Members: 0xff1f38f8cDae7C1B1B289FCF6f5C1AA234DF1443
-
Payment 1 (MARCH):
- 0xd333Bc5c9670C9cEb18f9A2CF02C6E86807a8227 - 1k ARB Done
- 0xA9D2BCF3AcB743340CdB1D858E529A23Cef37838 - 1k ARB Done
- 0xb5B069370Ef24BC67F114e185D185063CE3479f8 - 1k ARB Done
- 0x1de39f894c2DC773C8A11862F58165EcC7611C91 - 1k ARB Done
- 0xAD16ebE6FfC7d96624A380F394cD64395B0C6144- 1k ARB Done
-
Payment 2 (APRIL):
- 0xd333Bc5c9670C9cEb18f9A2CF02C6E86807a8227 - 1k ARB Pending
- 0xA9D2BCF3AcB743340CdB1D858E529A23Cef37838 - 1k ARB Pending
- 0xb5B069370Ef24BC67F114e185D185063CE3479f8 - 1k ARB Pending
- 0x1de39f894c2DC773C8A11862F58165EcC7611C91 - 1k ARB Pending
- 0xAD16ebE6FfC7d96624A380F394cD64395B0C6144- 1k ARB Pending
SEED Latam: 0xcCC2E9551C143b3295f90A096E75C68E07415843
-
Payment 1: Done
- SEEDLatam: 3.333 ARB
-
Payment 2: Pending
- SEEDLatam: 3.333 ARB
Summary Table
By the date of May 3, 2024 this is the corresponding table:
| Costs | Type | Status | Tx | ARB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Delegate Incentives | MARCH PAYMENT 1 | Done | March 1 | 57.357,52 |
| Delegate Incentives | MARCH PAYMENT 2 | Done | March 2 | 11.057,08 |
| Delegate Incentives | MARCH PAYMENT 3 | Pending | - | 31.065,75 |
| Delegate Incentives | APRIL PAYMENT | Pending | - | 124.234,16 |
| Multisign Members | PAYMENT 1 | Done | Multisign 1 | 5.000,00 |
| Multisign Members | PAYMENT 2 | Pending | - | 5.000,00 |
| Karma | PAYMENT 1 | Done | Karma 1 | 10.000,00 |
| Karma | PAYMENT 2 | Done | Karma 2 | 10.000,00 |
| SEED Latam | PAYMENT 1 | Done | SEED 1 | 3.333,00 |
| SEED Latam | PAYMENT 2 | Pending | - | 3.333,00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 260.380,51 |
Note: After the on-chain execution of payments, we will present the total settlement for the month of March and April.
In the table you can see that there are different payments for March, this is because some delegates have not yet completed the KYC process yet. Once these delegates receive their March compensation, this table will be updated.
New Members of the Program
As we said in previous posts, any delegate can apply to the program anytime.
In fact, we have some new participants that will be part of it from the next month (MAY):
KYC Process Requirement
As of today, some delegates still need to finish their KYC process with the Arbitrum Foundation. Delegates that already completed their KYC for Delegates Incentive Program don’t need to do it again. On the other hand, if you are a delegate who will receive compensation from this program, you must complete the KYC by sending an email to compliance@arbitrum.foundation. We will be contacting those delegates via DM on the forum.
[CALL TO ACTION!] Dispute Period
As stated in the proposal, delegates have 2 days to express their disagreement with the results presented by the Incentive System Administrator.
To raise a dispute, delegates should do so by posting a message in the forum using the following template:
Title: Dispute
User name
Reason for dispute (please detail)
Conclusions
This month we’ve seen how the LTIPP process took a lot of time from the delegates. This can lead to confusions about Delegates activity. Nevertheless, it’s visible how much effort delegates have put into this month.
Next month activities will be more varied and we are looking forward to see how our program evolves with the next iterations.
As we did in the previous iteration, we’ve collected manually the data related to Communication Rationales and Commenting in proposals.
Here you can see all the information related to CP and CR.
If you want to give any feedback, don’t hesitate to do it in this thread.
