[DIP v1.0]Delegate Incentive Program Results (October 2024)

Governance Delegate Incentives Program
1

We are proud to announce the initial outcomes of the seventh month of the Delegate Incentive Program. We can now share results with the Arbitrum ecosystem.

October Participants

For October iteration of the program, 61 participants enrolled, 56 of whom met the necessary requirements to qualify.

!https://global.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/uploads/arbitrum1/original/2X/a/ad18a5fc6563d5e0ea42077020dfc2fd9b9ad8bc.png

You can see the full list here.

Parameters Breakdown

Snapshot Voting

During the month, there were a total of 9 Snapshot Votes, which were considered for the assignment of scores by SV. It is important to note that only those proposals that ended in October were counted. These are the proposals that were considered:

  1. [Non-Constitutional] Whitelist Infura Nova Validator
  2. Research on context and retention
  3. An EIP-4824 powered daoURI for Arbitrum DAO
  4. LTIPP Retroactive Community Funding Selections
  5. Establishing a DAO Events Budget for 2025
  6. (V2) Arbitrum Research & Development Collective
  7. [Non-Constitutional] Arbitrum Token Swap Pilot Program
  8. GCP Council Re-Confirmation Vote for Tim Chang
  9. GCP Council Re-Confirmation Vote for John Kennedy

Tally Voting

For this month, a total of 7 Tally Votes were considered for TV scoring. It is important to note that only those proposals that ended in October counted. It’s important to clarify that proposals with the tag [CANCELED] are not counted for DIP. These are the proposals that were considered:

  1. UPDATED - Ethereum Protocol Attackathon Sponsorship
  2. [NON-CONSTITUTIONAL] Arbitrum DAO Procurement Committee: Phase II Proposal
  3. Constitutional AIP - Extend Delay on L2Time Lock
  4. [Non-Constitutional] Funds to Bolster Foundation’s Strategic Partnerships Budget
  5. ArbitrumDAO strategic “Off-site” (online) updated proposal
  6. Enhancing Multichain Governance: Upgrading RARI Governance Token on Arbitrum
  7. Fund the Stylus Sprint

Communication Rationale

For the CR, the published rationals of all the votes of the month were considered, taking into account Snapshot and Tally, that is to say, that to obtain the maximum qualification in this aspect a delegate had to express his rational of all the votes of the month, in other words, 16 (9 Snapshot + 7 Tally).

Commenting in proposals

The 9 Snapshot proposals were considered.

Additional Note

Delegate Incentive Program Proposals will not be considered for incentives, so we won’t consider the Delegate Incentive Program for this month’s results.

October Results

You can see the dashboard with the results implemented by Karma here.

Of all the participating delegates, 38 were eligible to receive compensation.

Delegate Address PARB
L2BEAT 0x41626BA92c0C2a1aD38fC83920300434082B1870 4.626,67
cp0x 0x6f9BB7e454f5B3eb2310343f0E99269dC2BB8A1d 4.526,67
Bob-Rossi 0xb29A655f3D67B2B6724Fb22B2C2303cB660c946B 4.460,00
Larva 0x5f38BB373dccB91AD9Fd3727C2b9BaF6DF9332D3 4.445,21
Jojo 0x1de39f894c2DC773C8A11862F58165EcC7611C91 4.440,00
PGov 0x3FB19771947072629C8EEE7995a2eF23B72d4C8A 4.347,08
olimpio 0xf4b0556b9b6f53e00a1fdd2b0478ce841991d8fa 4.333,33
404DAO 0xe93d59cc0bcecfd4ac204827ef67c5266079e2b5 4.250,00
Frisson 0xb5B069370Ef24BC67F114e185D185063CE3479f8 4.250,00
Tekr0x.eth 0x5FfD23B1B0350debB17A2cB668929aC5f76d0E18 4.230,00
Gauntlet 0xFd2892eFf2615C9F29AF83Fb528fAf3fE41c1426 4.166,67
0x_ultra 0x04330a444F9D051713b13c934d478a552165C205 4.135,21
Lampros Labs 0xA2D590FEe197C0b614Fe7c3E10303327F38C0dc3 4.116,67
Argonaut 0x21b3B193B71680E2fAfe40768C03a0Fd305EFa75 4.101,88
Tane 0xB79294D00848a3A4C00c22D9367F19B4280689D7 4.083,33
mcfly 0x821f2b40d965b81202b181Aba1c7a380C49Ed675 4.077,08
DAOplomats 0x9b651B16DA2286aa98196228496A0976Ea69867b 4.033,75
jameskbh 0x714D8b5874b3a6a69f289f4e857F4C9670074296 4.010,42
BlockworksResearch 0xA160b58a0108BC139Aafc1dC67846fcc2aD6D4Cd 3.928,93
Karpatkey 0xFD322Dd727419D1e437686Ba11ED562F8A8Ad573 3.905,21
NathanVDH 0xf9551c66995eD3Ff9bb05C9Fd7ff148Bd75dc99a 3.853,75
MaxLomu 0xd333Bc5c9670C9cEb18f9A2CF02C6E86807a8227 3.817,50
UADP 0x8326D18edfC50B4335113C33b25116ec268FF3fE 3.815,63
StableLab 0x9c489E4efba90A67299C1097a8628e233C33BB7B 3.681,25
Mehdi_eth 0x5F367BF126FDa56D88BA88a8978D5496c66B3569 3.641,25
Griff Green 0x839395e20bbB182fa440d08F850E6c7A8f6F0780 3.605,00
Curia 0x17296956b4E07Ff8931E4ff4eA06709FaB70b879 3.565,00
Bobbay 0x5a35923eD6950EFF4412eF6d27CeA8b1d405a844 3.547,50
Vertex Protocol 0x657e6d2073A99aF61952beb7EE564169616b90C1 3.512,71
0xDonPepe 0x010DC5440ad49f9Ec0Dd325b622d9FD225944ee4 3.465,63
Areta 0x8b37a5af68d315cf5a64097d96621f64b5502a22 3.318,96
Bruce 0x88Bd639d6B029596B029c61490F29f57b0bF4a3f 3.313,96
Ezr3al 0x8659D0BB123Da6D16D9394C7838BA286c2207d0E 3.312,71
GFXLabs 0xa6e8772af29b29B9202a073f8E36f447689BEef6 3.273,13
Kuiqian.eth 0xf3FE8c6c75bE4afB2F8200Fc77339abE4D7CFF33 3.214,38
Michigan Blockchain 0x13BDaE8c5F0fC40231F0E6A4ad70196F59138548 3.167,29
PennBlockchain 0x070341aA5Ed571f0FB2c4a5641409B1A46b4961b 3.125,83
Alex Lumley 0xA9cD2D7Fe90321BadD16ebf6b5dB7A6Be099ef2E 3.079,38

Bonus Points

No Bonus Points were given this month.

Costs

We track all cost data for greater transparency in our Payment Distribution Thread…

Incentives to delegates (October)

According this the results presented before the total cost destined to the delegates this month will be 146.778,93 ARBs.

You can check our Public Table to see the detailed breakdown of delegates results.

New Members of the Program

As we said in previous posts, any delegate can apply to the program anytime.

We have ten new participants who will be part of the program next month:

[CALL TO ACTION!] Dispute Period

As stated in the proposal, delegates have a timeframe to express their disagreement with the results presented by the Incentive Program Administrator.

To raise a dispute, delegates should do so by posting a message in the forum using the following template:

Title: Dispute

User name

Reason for dispute (please detail)

5 Likes
2

Title: Dispute

User name: @kuiclub

Reason for dispute (please detail): Hello @SEEDGov, it seems that my October CP points were not counted for this month, I participated in all the project votes and expressed my personal opinion on the proposals. However, I see that my CR score is very low and my CP is 0. I found my relevant proposal comments and opinions and it looks like I need to write a special thread to keep track of them for future management.

1:Tally | Arbitrum | Fund the Stylus Sprint
Comments
[RFC] Fund The Stylus Sprint - #48 by kuiclub

2、Tally | Arbitrum | Enhancing Multichain Governance: Upgrading RARI Governance Token on Arbitrum
Comments：Enhancing Multichain Governance: Upgrading RARI Governance Token on Arbitrum - #24 by kuiclub

3、Tally | Arbitrum | ArbitrumDAO strategic “Off-site” (online) updated proposal
Comments：Arbitrum Offsite format: online vs IRL - #67 by kuiclub
4、Tally | Arbitrum | [Non-Constitutional] Funds to Bolster Foundation’s Strategic Partnerships Budget
Comments：[Non-Constitutional] Funds to Bolster Foundation’s Strategic Partnerships Budget - #34 by kuiclub
5、Tally | Arbitrum | Constitutional AIP - Extend Delay on L2Time Lock
Comments：Constitutional - Extend Delay on L2Time Lock - #34 by kuiclub
6、Tally | Arbitrum | [NON-CONSTITUTIONAL] Arbitrum DAO Procurement Committee: Phase II Proposal
Comments：Arbitrum DAO Procurement Committee: Phase II Proposal - #58 by kuiclub

7:Tally | Arbitrum | UPDATED - Ethereum Protocol Attackathon Sponsorship

Comments：

3

Dispute

@Vertex_Protocol

We’re missing 5 rationales on the sheet which we believe are posted in this comment. We did cut it a bit close but if we’re adjusting for timezones properly we think this should have been within the window. Apologies if we’re not understanding something or did the math wrong!

4

Voted for all the proposals and have participated in posting my personal opinions, all provided comments, why is the CR so low and the CP is 0. Just came to the newcomer, a lot of do not understand the situation, please forgive me!

https://snapshot.org/#/profile/0xEAAeD688810e48837c3F48E7eBE062Cca9e2A9Ab

I wrote a poll thread of mine that gives more detailed data.

5

Title: Dispute

Jameskbh

Reason for dispute (please detail):

CR not taken into account:

On the DAO Event budget proposal:

Comment: Establishing a DAO Events Budget for 2025 - #15 by jameskbh

CR: Establishing a DAO Events Budget for 2025 - #32 by jameskbh

Only one input was considered.

6

Title: Dispute

User name @duokongcrypto

Reason for dispute (please detail) In response to my CP and CR I have some questions.
**Regarding the significantly low CP points and the 0 CR score, I want to clarify that I carefully reviewed each proposal before voting, actively participated in discussions, and expressed my personal opinions throughout the process. I would like to kindly request a detailed explanation for these assessments to better understand the reasoning behind them.**So my contention is that I didn’t take into account my deserved points。
In the meantime I have written up each of my proposals and opinions in my thread. I hope that helps me scrutinize them.

7

Title: Dispute
User name: @EzR3aL
Reason for dispute: I participated in every vote and made a comment for every snapshot vote or tally vote. I made a comment in the corresponding thread, linked my comment in every vote in the comment section and also posted a summary of my activites in my personal delegation communication thread

  1. Comment for snapshot vote "An EIP-4824 powered daoURI for Arbitrum DAO " has not been taking into account.
    See here for my comment: An EIP-4824 powered daoURI for Arbitrum DAO - #34 by EzR3aL

  2. Comment for snapshot vote Establishing a DAO Events Budget for 2025 has not been taking into account.
    See here for my comment: Establishing a DAO Events Budget for 2025 - #29 by EzR3aL

  3. Comment for snapshot vote GCP Council Re-Confirmation Vote for John Kennedy has not been taking into account.
    See here for my comment: Reconfirmation of GCP Council Appointees - #16 by EzR3aL

  4. Comment for tally vote UPDATED - Ethereum Protocol Attackathon Sponsorship has not been taking into account.
    See here for my comment: Ethereum Protocol Attackathon Sponsorship - #13 by EzR3aL

  5. Comment for tally vote [Non-Constitutional] Funds to Bolster Foundation’s Strategic Partnerships Budget has not been taking into account.
    See here for my comment: [Non-Constitutional] Funds to Bolster Foundation’s Strategic Partnerships Budget - #87 by EzR3aL

Please check the comments above and let me know if there are any questions left.
Thank you

8

Title: Dispute
User: @0xTALVO.ETH_MTY
Reason:

Hello, reviewing the spreadsheet, I see that these discussions haven’t been considered. I have my vote on Tally/Snapshot, as well as my participation in the forum before they were on both platforms.

Bolster Funds

RARI Governance

Arbitrum DAO Procurement Committee: Phase ll Proposal

9

Title: Dispute

Username: @0xDonPepe

Reason for dispute: CR’s not taken into account

  1. [NON-CONSTITUTIONAL] Arbitrum DAO Procurement Committee: Phase II Proposal

  2. Constitutional - Extend Delay on L2Time Lock (On Aug 30 I edited the post to include CR for Snapshot. On Sept 27 I edited the post to include CR for Tally. Next time I’ll make new replies/posts instead of just editing the initial comment.)

  3. ArbitrumDAO Off-site - Directional proposal

10

Title: Dispute

User: @Argonaut

Reason for dispute:

We’ve noticed that one of our rationales hasn’t been considered for a vote on Tally. The rationale has been prepared and can be found in our communication thread. Here’s the information:

We look forward to your reply. Thanks!

11

Title: Dispute

User: cp0x

Reason for dispute:

Unfortunately, it is impossible to determine from the Karma table exactly which comments were not included in those that are taken into account when calculating.
Therefore, I will have to send a list of all comments, and you can tell me which were not taken into account/got lost.
If you think that some of my comments are also not useful, please write as well:

  1. AIP: Whitelist Infura Nova Validator - #15 by cp0x
    I find it useful that I found out that Infura is not officially a DAC participant.
  2. Research on context and retention - #68 by cp0x
    I had several comments, but I think this one is useful to close the dialogue about the possibility of access to open data.
  3. Team #6: An (EIP-4824 powered) daoURI for the Arbitrum DAO - #28 by cp0x
    Since this proposal was voiced earlier at GovHack Brussels, you may not have taken my comments into account.
  4. LTIPP Retroactive Community Funding - #10 by cp0x
    I was one of the participants who applied for this grant, so I have a comment.
  5. Establishing a DAO Events Budget for 2025 - #19 by cp0x
    Here I asked a practical question about ARB conversion, and it was not the only comment.
  6. [NON-CONSTITUTIONAL] - Arbitrum Research and Development Collective [Term 2] - #10 by cp0x
    This is one of the most discussed topics, so I had a lot of questions.
  7. Proposal [Non-Constitutional] Arbitrum Treasury Token Swap Program - #26 by cp0x
    This proposal was submitted twice, so you may not have seen my comment in the original version. By the way, my comments influenced the final version for voting.
  8. There wasn’t much to discuss here.
  9. Reconfirmation of GCP Council Appointees - #11 by cp0x
    I wrote questions about the previous member of the committee, why he left and had personal correspondence with John Kennedy about this. Also in my thread I expressed my opinion that there are other members who did not get into the board, although they received more votes in the earlier voting.

So I think I definitely have 8 useful comments out of 9.

12

Title: Dispute

User name: @WinVerse

Reason for dispute (please detail): We have two disputes.

  1. We communicated rationale for every vote in October but you say we missed two. Please check here to see where we linked every one of our vote rationale in October to their topic.
  2. We didn’t get any points for commenting. Please see our notable comment under the token swap discussion here.
13

Hi all,

@Vertex_Protocol, your CR has been updated with the Communication Rationales.

@JamesKBH the missing CR and CP have been updated.

@Ezr3al, your score has been updated. It’s important to note that the Ethereum Protocol Attackathon Sponsorship rationale has not been considered since your comment corresponds to the Snapshot phase of the proposal.

@0xTALVO.ETH_MTY, those Rationales that you mention as ‘valid’ correspond to the Snapshot phase of the proposal. Those comments were already counted last month when the proposal was on Snapshot, and no rationales for the on-chain votes were submitted. You can check for more info in the September Public Table.

@0xdonpepe, your CR has been updated.

That would be great since the Forum doesn’t notify users when a post is edited, and it’s easier to miss it.

@argonaut, your CR has been updated

@daoplomats, your CR has been updated. About CP, given the context in which the comment was published (during the middle of Snapshot) and considering that other users had already commented on the content of the Commenting in Proposal, we decided not to consider it a High-Impact comment.

@Cp0x:

1- was already counted

2- was already counted

3- since the question was important and triggered the answer of the proposer, we’ll count it.

4- since your comment was intended to receive financial compensation, we decided not to consider it.

5- since the questions were important and triggered the answer of the proposer, we’ll count it.

6- was already counted

7- was already counted

9- This is more of a Communication Rationale than a Commenting in Proposals so it won’t be considered as CP.

Remember that you can always check our Public Table. In the sheet ‘Forum Comments’ you can find every member’s contribution. The ‘1’ represents Communication Rationales and the ‘2’ represents Commenting on Proposals.

5 Likes
15

Title: Dispute

User name: @kuiclub

Reason for dispute (please detail): Delegate Incentive Program Results (October 2024) - #2 by kuiclub

Hi, I think I should have a lot of unupdated data, especially CR & CP
I provide all my polls with comment threads