Title: Dispute
ChamaDAO
We’d like to raise a dispute for results of December 2024. It would also be good to clarify somewhat how and when forum comments vs Snapshot rationale form entries are included in this scoring.
Specific Concerns:
- Communication Rationale:
- Some of our comments were marked as invalid, despite providing relevant analysis and critique. We have consistently stood against overspending by the DAO and have regularly communicated it in threads and in our Snapshot voting rationale. Communication rationale that is included in Snapshot should also be included as part of our CR score. To our knowledge we have provided rationale in each Snapshot vote in the appropriate form, but it is not clear they are showing in the new version of Snapshot. However, there are some that are not included in CR score like on the votes here, here, and here. We would appreciate clarification on the criteria used and a review of these assessments.
-
Delegate Feedback
Additionally we provided feedback to two proposals this month and in previous threads that were then voted this month. Can we clarify if only forum posts in the current month are counted towards these scorings. We provided feedback this month on the DAO grants allocation and Designing the Reporting and Information function. Both provided feedback along the usual lines of our criticisms of bad spending and promotion of value add programs for the DAO. If there are further guidelines on what counts to this section please provide them as explained in the main thread it is unclear why we are missing points here. -
Call Attendance
We had a representative attend the Monthly governance call so believe that we should have bonus points applied for this section.
Requested Actions:
- Please review our Snapshot comments and communication rationale to see if it should add to the CR scoring here.
- Increase the DF scoring here considering we have been giving consistent and clear feedback on less spending when we post.
- Account for attendance on governance monthly call.