Title: Dispute
Username: paulofonseca
I would like for the following comments of mine to be considered valid and scored for DF:
- This comment was the one that made clear to the whole DAO that there was a secret delegate meeting in Denver and prompted the answer by Patrick where he confirmed that the new Vision is a result of that meeting. Therefore, I think it was a very valuable comment to do, at that time, and should be considered valid. Establishing a DAO Events Budget for 2025 - #101 by paulofonseca
- This comment where I share the podcast recording I did about the new vision A Vision for the Future of Arbitrum - #36 by paulofonseca
- Any of my 4 comments in this proposal where I added context and clarification about the Arbitrum Delegates Private Telegram chat Proposal: enable the new TogetherCrew functionality: Free* summarizer and Q&A for delegates telegram chat - #3 by paulofonseca
- This suggestion is valuable and worth scoring I believe ARDC Communication Thread - #21 by paulofonseca
I would also like to ask for a rescoring of this comment of mine, since it was the first one in the thread that offered the idea that fighting vote buying services is a fruitless endeavor and explained why. So much so, that after my comment, other delegates pointed out the same argument.
I would also like to ask for this comment of mine to be considered valid, retroactively since it was posted on March 29th, since I believe it ended up influencing the election results for the OpCo. OpCo – Oversight and Transparency Committee (OAT) Elections - #5 by paulofonseca
I would also like for this dispute of March to be answered by @SEEDGov [DIP v1.6] Delegate Incentive Program Results (March 2025) - #20 by paulofonseca
Regarding the Bonus points, I would like to point out that the BP awarded to multiple people because of ETH Bucharest is not proportional to what was actually done on the ground, at least from my point of view. Namely:
- @TempeTechie and @Tekr0x.eth had very similar involvement, from my PoV, and a 2x difference is unfair. Maybe more like a 1.5x difference would make more sense, especially because the event for the run had 0 attendees.
- Denys from @lobbyfi and @zer8 were also present at the booth and helped quite a bit, I think they should get BP as well.
- My involvement also included managing the Arbitrum hackathon track in several ways. Supporting both ChrisCo and Alex, the hackathon track managers, and also mentoring and advising the hackathon teams. The most important work I did was to convince hackathon teams and individual hackaers, to participate in Arbitrum bounties, and we had 9 teams, out of 30 total, that did exactly that. So I believe the difference in BP between me and L2BEAT should be bigger than 1.5x.