voting 100% for Pedro Breuer (@pedrob) on the current offchain vote because once we look a little bit deeper, Pedro is, in my eyes, the only candidate in this election that doesn’t have any hint of a Conflict of Interest.
no conflict of interest in any “network competitor” (he said he would stop being a delegate at Scroll if he was elected), no conflict of interest by having a contributor role or financial relationship in Arbitrum DAO (other than the DIP which I also expect him to withdraw from, if elected), no conflict of interest by being in any other committee/council/initiative in Arbitrum DAO or any DAO-adjacent entities that could eventually contract with OpCo or the Arbitrum DAO.
I deeply believe that we need people for this Oversight and Transparency Committee that are truly credibly neutral and unbiased. This role will require from its members the upmost ethical behavior, neutrality and most importantly transparency, of any other role in this DAO. Also, Pedro is one of the very few in this election with the actual technical competencies to do this oversight and transparency focused role well, since he is one of the only 2 lawyers applying to this position (the other being @Pablo).
Also, if you closely check Pedro’s forum activity (just click here) you will see that he his one of the most detailed oriented delegates in this DAO. His feedback on proposals is always rich, deeply researched and clear, and also always pushing in the direction of more transparency by asking the right questions at the right time. And he has been doing that for a long while here at Arbitrum DAO, which means he has more context about the DAO than most.
I believe so much that Pedro is the best candidate for this role that, if I had the money to spare, I would publicly buy the 5 ETH LobbyFi instant 20M ARB vote for him.