STEP 2 STEP 2 Committee Preferred Allocations
Vote Decision: FOR
Rational: I support the committee and trust the rigor they assumed when selecting from a clearly broad enough sampling of options. I do want to ask if there is any publicly available data on why each asset was selected, why others were not, and/or the rubric by which they were assessed.
DRIP Snapshot Proposal – DeFi Renaissance Incentive Program (DRIP)
Commentary Update: DeFi Renaissance Incentive Program (DRIP) - #11 by DonOfDAOs
Vote Decision: FOR
Rationale: I vote FOR this snapshot vote as I appreciate the initiative and its more targeted approach to driving impact in the space. That said, I would like to see payment scaling based on KPI targets along the rubric of metrics desired. e.g. tranche grants as output metrics are met. I also am unsure why the full 80M must be carved out immediately. This to be a standard practice in the ecosystem that we set aside very large chunks for large scale initiatives at onset. I often feel this creates lock-in which can limit flexibility or program modification down the line.
Watch Dog – The Watchdog: Arbitrum DAO's Grant Misuse Bounty Program - #109 by danielo
Vote Decision: FOR
Rationale: This is intuitively an ecosystem-positive program