DAOplomats voted AGAINST this proposal on Tally.
We weren’t supportive of this initiative originally so we maintained our stance during the onchain vote.
gm, I decided to vote FOR this initiative on Tally.
While I remain skeptical on the urgency to scale the Entropy team before seeing further results, I want to show support for a more structured and coordinate approach towards the DAO, and Entropy is the entity that has shown the right drive and mindset.
Also appreciated a further breakdown of KPIs and costs on the Tally version.
1 Like
I voted in favor of the proposal, although the budget is high.
First, I appreciate all of Entropy’s contributions to the DAO so far. The thing is, Arbitrum DAO has spent millions of dollars on ecosystem incentives, diversifying the treasury through investments, approving various grants, etc. However, the operational efficiency budget has been inadequate relative to the size of the DAO. For that reason, until the execution of OpEx, I find Entropy’s exclusive services neutral, helpful, and irreplaceable.
Given the high budget and the continuation of working with Entropy tied to paying a performance bonus, I will be closely monitoring their work and will be more stringent in approving further budgets.
Hey @Entropy!
Yesterday was the 3 months mark after your onchain proposal has passed.
When are you planning to publish the promised quarterly transparency report? Can you provide specific dates for it?
Hey @paulofonseca —thanks for reaching out!
Our exclusive engagement with Arbitrum officially started at the beginning of September. We plan to publish our first report in early December, covering September – November 2024.
Hope this helps!
3 Likes
Hey! Noticed that Dashboards on Dune have all queries set to private mode.
Any specific reason for this?
Wouldn’t it be better to keep them open for transparency or publish the methodology?