The following reflects the views of L2BEAT’s governance team, composed of @krst, @Sinkas, and @Manugotsuka, and it’s based on their combined research, fact-checking, and ideation.
We voted FOR.
We spent a significant amount of time analyzing past Entropy performance and what they delivered, as well as discussing this current proposal with Entropy and other stakeholders in the Arbitrum ecosystem, including other delegates. We provided Entropy with feedback on the first version of the proposal, and we are satisfied with the changes included in the final version.
Although the first Entropy mandate hasn’t been perfect, the overall trajectory is positive. Their data dashboards have become a popular and reliable source of data about the Arbitrum ecosystem, and they have transformed complex draft ideas into practical proposals.
With OpCo about to come to life, we have high hopes for OpCo acting as the counterparty and accountability layer. We trust that this relationship will help Entropy deliver even better results on what they do best - treasury strategy, incentive design, and ecosystem growth support.
The revised compensation package, which pairs time-based vesting with performance-based ARB, keeps incentives aligned without new upfront outlays. We don’t see another team with comparable context or momentum, and we believe there’s still untapped value in Entropy’s skill set once OpCo is in place.