GCP Fund Security Review & Oversight

DAO Programs & Initiatives Arbitrum Gaming Ventures (AGV)
4

AFAIK, the Funds are in a mutisig with AF and OCL members, so the notion that are in total control of GCP members is not right, IMO.

We should remember that structure was put in place before the creation of the MSS.

So, regarding the motivation:

  1. It is fair. Maybe it is something to consider to move the funds to the MSS. (That would also help to save 180k in 3 years per Tally proposal description)
  2. I agree that we should ask (and GCP members/council) for timely upgrades. That is non-negociable.
  3. If it goes to the MSS, 3 is not an issue anymore.

In short, if this really an issue (I don’t feel so), we could use the existent structure (the MSS) put in place for situations like this. The access to the funds would remain in the same fashion as the previous GCP proposal, with added security and cost reduction.

2 Likes