Sorry to hear that! If it works for you I can jump on a quick call with you before this Governance Call and get your feedback on the topics on the agenda to pass on during the call to make sure your point of view is represented. If that sound interesting hit me up on DM and we’ll set it up.
The same goes for anybody else that can’t attend at the given timeslot but would like to be able to express their opinion - I’m happy to coordinate with you somehow on that.
This is great, I’ll be there! Echoing someone else that I am having trouble getting the calendar link to work. I think a shared calendar would help with that discoverability issue to @dennison 's point
Just a quick reminder that the call is happening today, 4PM UTC, I encourage all interested delegates (along with other community members) to come over and join the discussion!
I am interested and it should be started as soon as possible. I also like the proposal by @krst. We can discuss some changes to it, after the first call. If we feel, some more changes can improve the overall experience.
I’m sharing this here for all the governance people who may have missed the other post. It includes a calendar which we could also use to set up the gov calls ahead of time. WYT?
Hello Guys! From SeedLatam, @cattin and I started this work to create Minutas after each Open Governance Meeting. There is the Minuta of the First Open Governance Call. So you guys can check it if you didn’t have the chance to participate on it.
Arbitrum Open Governance Call #1
Attendance (aprox. 22 people): Krzystof from L2beat, Patrick from Arbitrum Foundation, Max from Lemma, and more governance members.
Talk about refunding users who sent their tokens to the contract address.
A brief description of the problem.
Foundation’s response (Patrick) says DAO should decide.
Tokens sent to the contract are considered burnt.
People keep sending funds to the contract.
If users can be refunded, how would it work? (Krystof).
If someone proposes a solution, the foundation will support on technical and security issues.
Talk about QiDAO tokens and LP tokens, discussion about if it should be considered into the DAO as voting power.
The majority of the speakers agreed to find a way to make it.
Foundation suggests following the format for presenting AIPs proposed by the constitution.
DAO Grants
Check for updates on Monday (Said by Lemma).
A proposal template will be released.
Legal issues associated with Grants should be considered.
Question: Will ArbitrumDAO be like Optimism?.
Answers: Suggests using the Optimism framework (copy-paste type).
Users talk about their ideas on how to set up a grant program.
Relationship between the DAO and the foundation.
The foundation has decision-making power over the treasury funds and ecosystem improvements. The foundation will align with it. However, due to regulatory issues, the foundation will maintain powers to approve or reject AIPs for such cases.
Conclusion
This was a little minuta about the talk that the delegators had in that moment. Thank you so much for reading this and We hope to bring you more minutas in the future.
