Lampros DAO Delegate Communication Thread

[Euphoria]

Snapshot Votes

---

1. AGV Council Compensation Calibration: Startup-Phase Bonus for Current Council Members
   Voted - FOR
   Reason -

@Euphoria

The following reflects the views of the Lampros DAO governance team, composed of Chain_L (@Blueweb) and @Euphoria, based on our combined research, analysis, and ideation.

We are voting FOR Proposal B in the Snapshot voting.

Building a venture vehicle like AGV within a DAO structure is demanding work. The inaugural Council went beyond advisory duties; it shaped AGV’s governance, compliance, and operational systems from the ground up. That level of commitment and ownership deserves fair recognition, especially given how much of AGV’s foundation now relies on those early efforts.

We believe the proposed startup-phase bonus is a fair and measured way to acknowledge that work. It reflects the time, responsibility, and strategic input required to bring AGV from idea to execution. Since it’s funded fully within AGV’s existing budget, it also demonstrates a disciplined approach to compensation and resource management.

Supporting this proposal aligns with our broader view that meaningful DAO programs demand real commitment, and recognizing those who deliver helps strengthen accountability and trust across the ecosystem.

---

2. AIP: Raise the gas target, min L2 base fee, & implement improvements to the pricing algorithm
   Voted - FOR
   Reason -

@Euphoria

The following reflects the views of the Lampros DAO governance team, composed of Chain_L (@Blueweb) and @Euphoria, based on our combined research, analysis, and ideation.

We are voting FOR this proposal in the Snapshot voting.

@offchainlabs

This AIP proposes to reduce the severity, frequency, and duration of high L2 gas prices during periods when demand exceeds the gas target by introducing a new set of gas targets and new, accompanying adjustment windows for Arbitrum One and Arbitrum Nova.

We support this direction. Frequent gas spikes have been one of the few remaining pain points for both users and developers on Arbitrum. The introduction of multiple gas targets and longer adjustment windows feels like a well-reasoned and data-backed step to make network fees more predictable without compromising stability.

@offchainlabs

this AIP is accompanied by an increase in the minimum L2 base fee from 0.01 gwei/gas to 0.02 gwei/gas to help reduce spam and offset any potential decline in the portion of L2 surplus fee-derived transaction fees (during periods of peak demand) to the ArbitrumDAO.

We agree with this adjustment. The increase is minimal for users but meaningful in reducing spam-driven transactions and balancing the DAO’s revenue model. It shifts the fee dynamics slightly toward a more stable and predictable income stream, which is healthy for long-term sustainability.

@offchainlabs

this proposal requests the ArbitrumDAO grant Offchain Labs permission, for 2 years from the mainnet activation of this proposal, to adjust the gas targets and adjustment windows in Table 1, in addition to the right to add up to 10 more gas targets and adjustment values.

We find this reasonable. OCL has the technical competence, and granting limited, transparent flexibility for parameter adjustments allows the network to evolve dynamically. Still, we expect visibility into every change; public logs, clear reasoning, and metrics showing network impact, to maintain accountability during this delegated period.

We also acknowledge the updated node hardware requirements. They are realistic for today’s operators, but maintaining transparency around decentralization metrics will remain important as throughput increases.

Overall, this proposal aligns with DAO’s long-term goals: improving user experience, keeping the system scalable, and preserving stability. It is a technically sound and forward-looking change, and we are confident in its positive impact on both the ecosystem and DAO revenue health.