The following reflects the views of the Lampros DAO governance team, composed of Chain_L (@Blueweb) and @Euphoria, based on our combined research, analysis, and ideation.
We are voting FOR this proposal in the Snapshot voting.
For the sake of maintaining quorum and ensuring that important proposals do not get stuck in gridlock, we see this program as a necessary step. Incentivizing active participation will help keep the DAO functioning smoothly and reduce voter apathy over time.
On the aspect of posting rationales, we are definitely in favour. It is a basic principle every delegate should follow. Sharing rationales not only adds transparency but also helps delegators clearly see how and why their delegate voted. Many delegates, including several with less than 200k voting power, already follow this practice, and formalizing it through a structured program will only strengthen governance standards.
We hope that future iterations will review the 200k ARB minimum threshold so more active mid-size delegates can take part, and that clear reporting standards are maintained to track cost-effectiveness and participation impact.