The following reflects the views of the Lampros DAO governance team, composed of Chain_L (@Blueweb) and @Euphoria, based on our combined research, analysis, and ideation.
We are voting FOR this proposal in the Snapshot voting.
Today, the quorum in the DAO is based on the total voteable supply, but proposals pass or fail based on delegated voting power. That gap has been growing over time, and it’s starting to show. Reaching quorum is becoming harder even when the same set of active delegates consistently participate.
Moving the quorum to delegated voting power is a more honest representation of how governance should actually work. It doesn’t change who has power or how votes are counted. It only changes what we measure quorum against.
We looked closely at the parameters. For non-constitutional proposals, the numbers are very close to where the quorum already sits today. For constitutional proposals, the bar remains high and is still stricter.
There are valid concerns about concentration, but the current system already allows a group of delegates to influence outcomes. From our view, a quorum model that reflects real participation is more robust than one tied to a supply number that rarely shows up.
Overall, this improves governance liveness without lowering standards. That’s why we’re in favour of the proposal.