I can’t tell if this post is a horrific take without any thought or malicious where you have a conflict of interest. There are also far more candidates than “all three candidates you randomly attempt to smear.”
Let’s answer your questions:
1. Conflict of interest: Aragon holds less than $50k worth of $Morpho tokens. This amount of $ is irrelevant and poses no conflict of interest. Further more Morpho is not a competitor of Arbitrum but is in fact one of its largest users/partners. This is not a conflict of interest. The statement you request is baked into the contract of being on the security council, it doesn’t need to be explicit.
2. On bandwidth: Aragon is a PROFESSIONAL SERVICE PROVIDER → we have immense bandwidth (does KPMG have bandwidth to offer professional auditing services to its customers?), we are on 3. We have 23 professional employees with experience dating back to 2017. We generate millions of $ in revenue. You should be more concerned with individuals applying for the council who have jobs, board positions, and are on other security councils. Not a professional service provider.
3. Voter turnout: What vote? This is a statement of intention to educate Arbitrum token holders that we and others will be applying for the security council role. There is no need for engagement.
This is the exact type of ill-informed post that gives DAOs a bad name and eats away at the bandwidth of every token holder.