Michael Lewellen - Candidate for Arbitrum Security Council - Mar 2025

Introduction

gm. I am excited to announce my candidacy for the Arbitrum Security Council as an individual member. With over a decade of experience in the blockchain industry working on security, smart contract development, and onchain governance, I bring a deep understanding of securing decentralized protocols and responding to emerging threats.

Having previously served on the Arbitrum Security Council as part of OpenZeppelin, I have firsthand experience navigating the council’s responsibilities and ensuring the safety of the ecosystem. My contributions extend beyond Arbitrum, having played key security roles in multiple DAOs, including Compound, zkSync, and OpenZeppelin-led security initiatives.

Professional Background

I have spent my career at the intersection of smart contract security, governance, and incident response. Some of my key roles include:

  • Head of Solutions Engineering at Blockaid – Currently leading security solutions for one of the premier onchain security platforms used by Coinbase, MetaMask, Uniswap, and other major blockchain organizations.
  • Head of Solutions Architecture at OpenZeppelin (~4 years) – Designed security frameworks for DAOs, managed high-profile audits, and co-authored Security Council Best Practices for decentralized governance.
  • Security Advisor for Compound DAO (3+ years) – Providing security guidance and incident response support for one of DeFi’s most established lending protocols, leading OpenZeppelin’s partnership.
  • Security Council Member (Arbitrum, Compound, ZkSync) – Managed or participated in live incidents and drills. Contributed to governance security and emergency response frameworks.

Beyond these roles, I am an active contributor to Web3 security initiatives, including:

Incident Response & Governance Contributions

I have directly led or contributed to responses for major security incidents in the DeFi ecosystem, including:

My experience responding to critical threats has reinforced my belief in proactive security measures, structured monitoring, and effective emergency governance—principles I would bring to the Arbitrum Security Council.

Involvement in the Arbitrum Ecosystem

I have been an active contributor to Arbitrum governance and security over the past year, including:

  • Leading security contributions to ARDC V1 – Played a key role in shaping the security strategy for the Arbitrum Research & Development Collective as OpenZeppelin’s representative.
  • Security Council Member (March 2024 Cohort, OpenZeppelin) – Served part of OpenZeppelin’s term as a signer and security steward for the Arbitrum ecosystem.
  • Stylus Sprint Grants Committee – Helping evaluate and fund projects advancing Arbitrum’s technology stack.
  • Participation in Arbitrum community events – Participating and occasionally speaking at events during EthCC, Devcon, and EthDenver.

Motivation for Joining the Arbitrum Security Council

Security councils are a critical line of defense for DAOs. They must be highly responsive, technically capable, and governance-aware.

My past experience working on DAO-specific security, serving on security councils and engaging in governance discussions, makes me a unique candidate that can effectively work with other council members. I have prior working relationships with many of the current security council members and candidates that would make me a highly collaborative participant within the Council that is both highly technical and able to contribute to independent decision-making in high-stress situations.

As a council member, I would ensure transparent, security-first decision-making, enhance monitoring capabilities, and collaborate with fellow members to fortify Arbitrum’s security infrastructure by finding appropriate areas within the DAO where the Security Council and its members should have an active voice.

Conflict of Interest Statement

I currently serve as Head of Solutions Engineering at Blockaid, an onchain security platform providing monitoring solutions for various protocols. My role does not pose a conflict of interest with Arbitrum’s Security Council responsibilities.

Additionally, I previously worked at and continue to advise OpenZeppelin, another candidate in this election. I view our candidacies as complementary—OpenZeppelin brings the expertise of a leading security organization, while I offer a DAO-aligned, independent security perspective. Ideally, both OpenZeppelin and I would be elected, strengthening the council with diverse yet aligned security expertise.

Conclusion

With my deep expertise in DeFi security, onchain governance, and incident response, I am eager to continue contributing to Arbitrum’s security as an individual Security Council member.

I look forward to engaging with the community and ensuring Arbitrum remains resilient against emerging threats.

If you have any questions or want to discuss security improvements for the Arbitrum ecosystem, feel free to reach out!

Twitter: @LewellenMichael

Thank you for your support! Let’s keep Arbitrum secure together!

6 Likes

I almost missed your application.
It would be great if you put an additional tag like other candidates.
image

Thank you for writing about your conflict of interest.
OpenZeppelin also applied to this cohort.
If you continue to advise this company, then I think it is a conflict of interest, because two candidates from one company are prohibited by the Arbitrum constitution (this is in case of both being selected, of course)

To clarify, the constitution actually states that “there should not be more than 3 candidates associated with a single entity or group of entities being elected to the Security Council, thereby ensuring that there will be no single entity or group of entities able to control or even veto a Security Council vote.”

Apologies! @raam was kind enough to add them for me.

If you continue to advise this company, then I think it is a conflict of interest, because two candidates from one company are prohibited by the Arbitrum constitution

As @raam shared, the Constitution permits for up to three candidates to be associated with the same entity. It shouldn’t affect either of our eligibility as candidates.

Furthermore, my advisory work is done as an independent contractor and I don’t believe it would have any meaningful impact on our ability to make separate security council decisions. I only shared it for the sake of transparency and to emphasize the fact that I believe we are complementary candidates.

That all being said, I’m open to hearing additional feedback if this is considered a risk in the eyes of other delegates.

1 Like

A big thank you to all the delegates that contributed votes to secure my nomination to the Security Council Election!

I’m looking forward to the official elections set to kick off in the coming weeks.

1 Like