The following reflects the views of the Lampros DAO (formerly ‘Lampros Labs DAO’) governance team, composed of Chain_L (@Blueweb), @Euphoria, and Hirangi Pandya (@Nyx), based on our combined research, analysis, and ideation.
Thank you for sharing the proposal. The comprehensive approach to understanding our developer ecosystem is great.
We appreciate the direct interviews with builders and entrepreneurs is an excellent step forward. This approach will definitely provide actionable insights far beyond what surveys or desk research could achieve.
We agree with what @thedevanshmehta has also mentioned. While the research report promises valuable insights, there’s a possibility that the findings may not translate into actionable outcomes. How will the DAO ensure that the recommendations are implemented effectively and not just sit as a theoretical report? There should be additional steps beyond just submitting the research report; the process should not end with the submission.
While the success bonus incentivizes high-quality work, it introduces subjectivity. Could you clarify how the criteria for awarding the bonus will be structured to ensure fairness and transparency?
Apart from the questions, we would like to share some feedback about the timing of this proposal. The proposal was posted on Friday, November 22, and today, November 29 (also a Friday), it has already been moved to a Snapshot vote for a temperature check. This feels a bit rushed and doesn’t allow enough time for everyone to discuss and share their thoughts if we see the current engagement in this proposal.
According to the Delegate Code of Conduct, it’s recommended that Snapshot votes should start on Thursdays at 12 p.m. UTC to give enough time for proper discussion and avoid rushing decisions. But this proposal went up on Snapshot on Friday. We hope this can be kept in mind for future proposals so that there’s enough time for everyone to review, provide feedback and then vote on proposals.