[Non-Constitutional] Arbitrum DAO Delegate Code of Conduct + Formalizing the DAO's Operations

voting Against the current offchain proposal because I think this proposal needs to abide by the constitutional level of quorum (5% and not 3% as proposed) since it’s going to be a constitutional proposal in the end of its trial period. I believe it needs to have 5% of quorum participation so that it is able to enforce the consequences outlined for the delegates that don’t follow this CoC during the trial period, otherwise the trial period would not be really testing the implementation of this proposal. Also, I don’t agree with the assumption that elections should have shielded votes, since that was not the outcome of the previous temperature check vote on that matter. In general I agree we should have a CoC for Delegates like this one, but I feel that this one is not enough since it doesn’t enforce a strict voting policy for delegates that have disclosed or obvious conflicts of interest.