Voting for, as stated above I think the proposal is well thought out and creates a unique idea to try and attract talent that ultimately doesn’t cost the DAO that much. I still maintain a concern about ‘stickiness’, but at the end of the day that can’t be answered unless we try it. I think this is something worth pursuing as a test, if it fails so be it… but it’s worth trying out.
I’ll re-ask my initial question as I don’t thin kit was directly addressed and would like to see before a possibly Tally vote.
Probably my only concern would be ‘stickiness’ of the Governance Analysts to be able to remain employed by the Ten Protocols. A lot of that is beyond our control, but has there been any discussion on ensuring these analysts have a long-term impact? Whether that is front-end stuff (deciding which 10 protocols to pick) or the back-end (if there is analyst that just loses their job 2 months in there are backup protocols or a pool or potential protocols to rotate to?).