This seems like a very strong action/reaction, but I’m unsure there is a strong basis. If possible it would be nice to see links or other sources backing up each part of this statement, to make it easier to follow.
By my understanding the enumerated failures are just 4:
-
Treasure DAO – has already exited Arbitrum
I am not entirely sure it is fair to lay this at the feet of GCP, but perhaps there is context that would make it so. -
other key contributors have either stepped down or signaled waning commitment
Who were the key contributors? Did they state a reason? -
the GCP has repeatedly shown a reluctance to adequately document its activities and performance
Sourcing would be helpful to judge the merits of this failing. -
the program has recently sought to increase contributor compensation and lower its own reporting requirements
Supported by the link OP provided, but this in itself does not seem a strong reason to close up shop.
I’m sure the proposing parties have good reasons for making this proposal, but in reading it I feel like the case is not sufficiently made. Perhaps there are further unstated failures, and/or with context the stated failures become more severe, but if that’s the case I think we need that additional context.