[Non-Constitutional] GCP Clawback

[paulofonseca]

Hey there @Djinn and @DavidBolger, reading this:

@Djinn

Establishing an investment focused program with a goal of also generating value for the Arbitrum DAO as opposed to only dispersing grants, was and remains a unique undertaking;

@DavidBolger

I think a token holder owned entity of the DAO with the vision to grow the ecosystem through investments rather than relying 100% on grants (or not and falling behind the competition) is a great example of DAO innovation.

@Djinn

The first cohort of grants is being processed, with a top native builder, innovative loyalty platform, entertainment focused chain, and esports / ecommerce platform being among the first cohort

…I have a question, is GCP currently also giving grants to gaming projects? If so, how much was spent on grants already? and are these gaming grants different from the ones the @Arbitrum Foundation reported in their recent transparency report, or are these the same gaming grants the AF has given out? If they are the same, who is giving out the gaming grants after all? if they are not the same, how do you coordinate this gaming grant giving activity?