[Non-Constitutional] GCP Clawback

[jameskbh]

Hello!

Thanks for the proposal. I have a few comments/questions:

I would like to see evidence of the following claims, as it is part of the motivation for the proposal.

@NathanVDH

and other key contributors have either stepped down or signaled waning commitment.

Regarding updates/reports:

@NathanVDH

In addition, the GCP has repeatedly shown a reluctance to adequately document its activities and performance.

While I do agree that the reporting/communication front is lacking A LOT, there was an update literally yesterday:

GCP Update Thread

Hey Arbinauts, excited to share a preview of this upcoming week as the Arbitrum Gaming Catalyst and ecosystem continue to grow. First of all - huge shout out to the Arbitrum contributors that made GDC 2025 such a success for us. The Arbitrum Foundation, Offchain Labs, Gaming Catalyst, and partners including Wolves DAO, our impressive showcase builders including Proof of Play, Jin Anomaly, Beacon, Xai Games (and their builders!), and too many other folks to name made a huge splash. The amount o…

I’m not against having best security practices regarding reporting/funds distribution, but I want to add extra information here and also invite the author(s) to provide evidence backing their claims, so the delegates/interested parties can find everything in one place.

@NathanVDH

Despite a 225 million ARB allocation, the program has struggled to launch even basic operational processes such as transparent reporting and grant issuance.

Can you clarify/add which KPIs were not met? This is their last report.

@NathanVDH

Transferring these funds back to a more secure DAO treasury system is a necessary step to protect our collective assets.

Can you clarify what does this mean?

Thanks in advance!