As wrote in the proposal (while only at high level), the reporting should match the following:
- monthly report for all domains, in a standardized way. One of the gap is that there is no standard between domains and DAs right now
- month report in governance call. TBD which one, so far the GCR seems the natural choice, but we should keep it flexible based on what the dao will conduct over the year
- likely, a 6 months more profound reporting, and maybe an ad hoc call, to see where the program is going. We can discuss if this should be done quarterly, don’t necessarily see the benefit but keen to adapt if there is demand
- mandatory reporting by grantee participants in the forum, which for now is a limited and non standard initiative
- an analysis on the followup interview, the one 3 months after completion, to translate data into lessons learned. I can’t really provide details on this because likely this interview will be prepared down the road, but the goal is to unify the data.
Any idea on the above @BlockworksResearch? If you think is not enough, or should be different.
Can you provide your specific example here? Orbit will already receive half of the funds of other domains, even tho some delegates have expressed how they would like it to be $1.5M as the others.
On domains having different leverage, I could potentially agree, but at the same time I can acknowledge that different people might have different priorities in mind, with some folks wanting to favor for example Education/community/content cause they value physical presence on the ground as more valuable than financiang Dev tooling for example, or viceversa.
What I mean is that while there is a merit in thinking “not all domains are born equal” or “not all domains bear the same effect on the ecosystem”, I honestly don’t think we should lower any of this domain since the spending per month is up to $125k, an high absolute amount but relative low amount. So, if we want to make this domains unequal, a solution could be during the year to vote to allocate more funds, and potentially more personnel, to a specific domain, which is in line with the modularity we have in mind for this new iteration.