The OpCo proposal addresses key gaps in DAO strategy execution, but there are areas that require further clarification and improvement - some of our comments and suggestions can be found below:
- Operational Autonomy vs. Oversight
- OpCo should act as a facilitator and coordinator, not a centralized authority.
- Establish clear boundaries to ensure OpCo doesn’t overreach or take over existing roles.
- Include advisor focus groups (delegates, service providers, researchers) to keep OpCo aligned with DAO priorities.
- Our Position: OpCo should only manage programs when no viable external provider exists, focusing primarily on facilitation and oversight.
- Budget and Compensation
- Some salaries appear high and need further justification.
- Role Clarity and Avoiding Redundancy
- Define responsibilities to prevent overlap with Entropy and other contributors.
- Focus on addressing gaps in under-resourced areas rather than duplicating efforts.
- Accountability and KPIs
- Establish clear Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) to measure OpCo’s success.
- Align OAT compensation with measurable outcomes.