I’m generally in favor of this proposal. Romania is emerging as a country that is pushing strongly in the IT and blockchain fields, and having collaborated with highly skilled Romanian developers on multiple occasions, I believe hosting this event in Bucharest has the potential to yield positive results in attracting developers and expanding the developer community.
Regarding the proposal’s content, I feel the budget could be better justified, particularly concerning the significant price difference for the POAP option. I would appreciate a more detailed breakdown of expenses - and perhaps a reduction in the overall budget - before the Tally vote.
I’ve decided to vote for Option 2, “FOR, without POAP”. While I believe POAPs are a nice feature, the price difference seems disproportionately high and inadequately justified. That said, you have my support and I’m happy to see all the efforts that were made for coming up with this proposal. However I’d appreciate if some changes were made potentially reducing the budget before moving to Tally if the proposal passes the temperature check.